Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
27. actually, why not read the law itself. NONE of what you say is true
Sun Feb 3, 2013, 01:43 PM
Feb 2013

first off 7-11 is NOT one of the places, so you could buy a 100 ounce if you wish at 7-11

and NOTHING stops you from buying 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, 32 ounce or 16 ounce at all

NOTHING stops you from buying 100 two liter bottles in a supermarket

you miss the whole point

However, why would you need 48 and a refill in 90 minutes?

Nobody is going to ticket you buying it.

Again, everything in your theory here is 100% false.

It has NO basis in the law whatsoever, nor is it a point.

bullshit Enrique Feb 2013 #1
Do you like Reuters as a news source? PoliticalPizza Feb 2013 #23
Except that article doesn't say anything about a $200 fine for buying a large soda. Squinch Feb 2013 #25
Bravo Mike! for all your wellness plans including the 48 ounce ban & being anti-NRA/anti-GUn graham4anything Feb 2013 #2
You say nobody "needs" 48 oz. of soda. nick of time Feb 2013 #3
I can understand why some hate this mega liberal from Mass. The NRA and their fans for instance graham4anything Feb 2013 #4
What part of it's up to the individual nick of time Feb 2013 #6
the point is not the ban, but to think about what one is doing to their body graham4anything Feb 2013 #8
You welcome the nanny state? nick of time Feb 2013 #10
one always needs a friend in their hour of need graham4anything Feb 2013 #11
Yes I would want to buy another 48 minutes of life, nick of time Feb 2013 #12
One day at a time. graham4anything Feb 2013 #13
Huh? nick of time Feb 2013 #14
my answer to your question is One day at a time graham4anything Feb 2013 #15
So why not just say that instead of a rambling post? nick of time Feb 2013 #16
it makes no sense without context graham4anything Feb 2013 #17
Whatever. nick of time Feb 2013 #18
without the rambling post, John Lennon's death could not have been brought into the discussion graham4anything Feb 2013 #19
Maybe, nick of time Feb 2013 #20
I think all they should sell Duckhunter935 Feb 2013 #30
Be careful. nick of time Feb 2013 #31
Does this mean large bottles of soda in the grocery store cannot be sold? dixiegrrrrl Feb 2013 #5
you miss the point. the point is like a timeout in a football game. Gives one time to think graham4anything Feb 2013 #9
an enterprising soul could make a mint selling 31.9 oz drinks zbdent Feb 2013 #7
The endless mayoralty... NYtoBush-Drop Dead Feb 2013 #21
I completely agree with you about Bloomberg. The guy is wrecking the city's schools, and I will be Squinch Feb 2013 #26
People like the "nurturing" vs. "authoritarian" division. Igel Feb 2013 #22
It's a load of crap davidpdx Feb 2013 #24
actually, why not read the law itself. NONE of what you say is true graham4anything Feb 2013 #27
Tickets will not be given to people who break the law by selling large soda, not those who buy it. Travis_0004 Feb 2013 #33
there is no demand. It is just put in front and people think they are getting a bargain graham4anything Feb 2013 #35
So in your opinion people are stupid. Travis_0004 Feb 2013 #37
Please don't put words in my mouth & I won't again put a 48ounce soda in mine graham4anything Feb 2013 #38
Then the law is toothless.... davidpdx Feb 2013 #39
you are missing the point. Punishment is not the point. Wellness is. graham4anything Feb 2013 #40
There's still no point davidpdx Feb 2013 #41
Well, they didn't call it bootlegging for nothing. nt Eleanors38 Feb 2013 #29
Nanny State in action. kaiserhog Feb 2013 #28
While I don't know that I support a ban... Bjorn Against Feb 2013 #32
If you are handed a 32 oz drink, then just fill it up half way if you only wan't 16oz. Travis_0004 Feb 2013 #34
As I said I don't necessarily support a ban Bjorn Against Feb 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Mayor Bloomberg and The P...»Reply #27