Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EFerrari

(163,986 posts)
5. The government claims the right to hold prisoners indefinitely without charge
Tue Jun 26, 2012, 07:03 AM
Jun 2012

and to assassinate enemies of the state anywhere without obligation to present evidence in any court.

Not much room for negotiation there.

Are Assange's fears justified? [View all] EFerrari Jun 2012 OP
I don't know, but I entirely understand his concerns. Lionessa Jun 2012 #1
His extradition to Sweden is based solely on being wanted for questioning dipsydoodle Jun 2012 #2
The government claims the right to hold prisoners indefinitely without charge EFerrari Jun 2012 #5
Not unless the governmental policy is to protect war criminals and go after whistle-blowers. AnotherMcIntosh Jun 2012 #3
Well done. nt bemildred Jun 2012 #8
Note to Assange: When it is Officially Denied, Consider it True solarman350 Jun 2012 #4
Does that mean that if its 'officially acknowledged' that its false? n/t Bodhi BloodWave Jun 2012 #9
Here's where this conspiracy theory falls down: jeff47 Jun 2012 #6
They just want to keep him penned up. bemildred Jun 2012 #7
Now THAT makes sense. But it's caused by Assange's actions, not a US conspiracy. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2012 #11
Assange caused the US to want to keep him penned up? bemildred Jun 2012 #13
They dislike that he published classified. jeff47 Jun 2012 #17
So that's a "no"? nt bemildred Jun 2012 #21
I really don't see how you got "no" out of that. jeff47 Jun 2012 #22
I don't see any causation in that. bemildred Jun 2012 #23
Public records aren't stamped SECRET. jeff47 Jun 2012 #24
All government records are public records. bemildred Jun 2012 #25
Now that's a novel theory. I bet none of the governments above you hold it. struggle4progress Jun 2012 #26
What's that you say? bemildred Jun 2012 #27
No. Unless you think the government should publish your address and social security number. jeff47 Jun 2012 #28
Those are public. Anybody can get them. Are you nuts? nt bemildred Jun 2012 #29
I can get your social security number without your permission? jeff47 Jun 2012 #30
Well, all right then, you can redact the SSNs. nt bemildred Jun 2012 #33
Not evil shadowy forces, jeff. Obama's Department of Justice. EFerrari Jun 2012 #10
Did you miss the part where this was not new and not prosecutable? (nt) jeff47 Jun 2012 #12
No. Did you miss the part where this Justice Department signed off on EFerrari Jun 2012 #14
Did you miss the part where those aren't illegal? jeff47 Jun 2012 #16
I'm talking about human rights abuses and your argument is that they're legal? EFerrari Jun 2012 #18
The US is waiting until it suits them, and here are the numbers, Mr Legal Expert reorg Jun 2012 #20
This is just a stupid game. US free speech law will, with few exceptions, protect anyone who merely struggle4progress Jun 2012 #15
"US free speech law will, with few exceptions, protect anyone who merely received & published info." EFerrari Jun 2012 #19
kr Solly Mack Jun 2012 #31
TRUTH, LEADERSHIP, MORALS AND VALUES AND AMERICA clang1 Jun 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Are Assange's fears justi...»Reply #5