Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court strikes down abortion clinic buffer zone [View all]davidpdx
(22,000 posts)13. terrorists
You can say that again....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Except we've seen what those "pro-life" protesters do, and to heck with being arrested.
Archae
Jun 2014
#1
Says the court that won't allow cameras to broadcast and record their mischief.
GeorgeGist
Jun 2014
#8
The Dancing Supremes are all pretending these anti-choice fanatics aren't a pack of murderers
fasttense
Jun 2014
#36
That's absurd. Of course they do. It's one of the fundamental protections of the
NYC Liberal
Jun 2014
#23
Hard decision. One has the right to free speech, but no right to force others to listen.
Thor_MN
Jun 2014
#18
Free speech doesn't just include talking. It includes handing out literature, petitions, etc.
NYC Liberal
Jun 2014
#22
Of course one has the right to offer it, but they have no right to force it upon a person
Thor_MN
Jun 2014
#35
For the most part. But we apparently disagree on how far the right to distribute literature extends.
Thor_MN
Jun 2014
#43
but Roberts approved the same restriction on the Supreme Court.... hypocrite
tomm2thumbs
Jun 2014
#24
Where are the rights of privacy of the individual going to see their doctor? That is how I see it.
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#31
And if you feel threatened, you can shoot the protesters. Remember to bring your gun
valerief
Jun 2014
#33
I agree with the decision also, and think it should apply to Occupy Wall Street protestors
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#44