Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)

2. Can't support personhood "NOW"

Reply to angka (Original post)

Fri Mar 21, 2014, 10:04 PM

Mar 2014

meaning he will right after the elections. Beware COs, a wolf in sheep clothing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

36 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate bombshell: Cory Gardner says "I can't support personhood now" [View all] angka Mar 2014 OP

Maybe ol' Cory's starting to come around. marble falls Mar 2014 #1

Or maybe he is lying. Guess which one I choose? nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #3

Is his mouth moving? politicat Mar 2014 #16

Can't support personhood "NOW" Iliyah Mar 2014 #2

The title left me wondering : personhood for corporations, or fetuses? pffshht Mar 2014 #4

Had the exact same thought. FiveGoodMen Mar 2014 #36

K&R..thanks, angka Cha Mar 2014 #5

so fertalized eggs .... paleotn Mar 2014 #6

are you trying to say that fertilized eggs are? BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #11

yep, misunderstanding me..... paleotn Mar 2014 #17

ohh, I see...thanks for clarifying BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #18

read his wiki entry and see what you think: niyad Mar 2014 #19

well…definitely hate his economic and environment stances. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #20

he has sponsored anti-choice and personhood amendments. think his views on women are niyad Mar 2014 #21

yep. That's pretty clear. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #22

would love to believe you are correct, but wayyyy too familiar with this smiling bastard. niyad Mar 2014 #23

ugh…that article gives a much clearer picture BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #24

no, doug lamborn's, ughhhh niyad Mar 2014 #25

don't know him, BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #26

you are not missing anything-- here is a short review of doug "tar baby" lamborn: niyad Mar 2014 #27

hooo boy. What a peach. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #28

Gardner is a snake. nt mountain grammy Mar 2014 #7

yeah, right, cory--we believe you. niyad Mar 2014 #8

Stand back, folks...he's...he's...evolving! n/t Orsino Mar 2014 #9

Why is it always after the fact. Javaman Mar 2014 #10

because they don't read and think abstractly? I don't know, just tossing ideas out there…. BlancheSplanchnik Mar 2014 #12

he's just attempting to appeal to moderates to get elected notadmblnd Mar 2014 #13

The second extrememly important issue that should come from this is legislators shouldn't sponsor okaawhatever Mar 2014 #14

Is there an "R" after his name? calimary Mar 2014 #15

What he really meant to say was: Zambero Mar 2014 #29

riiiiiight . . . madamesilverspurs Mar 2014 #30

What Will His Church Say NOW otohara Mar 2014 #31

Will He Flip On Preexisting Conditions Too? otohara Mar 2014 #32

BTW, that cat gif is HILARIOUS! catbyte Mar 2014 #35

Maybe a close friend or relative would be adversely affected from such personhood policies. bulloney Mar 2014 #33

Or he realized he owns stock in a company that makes oral contraceptives. catbyte Mar 2014 #34