Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
26. I have not heard a single person in our governmant ever say that Karzai's government should try him
Thu Mar 15, 2012, 05:28 PM
Mar 2012

I agree with you that there are some here who are anti-military, but I think the percent is far lower than it would have been had the internet and this board existed in the late 1960s! ( disclaimer - I was a college student then) I think a large part of the credit for why many Democrats are less anti military than in the Vietnam era is John Kerry - both from 1971 and from the present.

Afghanistan massacre suspect flown to Kuwait [View all] muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 OP
I do NOT want this soldier leftynyc Mar 2012 #1
His victims were civilian Afghanistanis, witnesses are too; he did it in that country muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #2
Can he get a fair trial in Afghan civilian court? Bradical79 Mar 2012 #5
By Treaty with the present Afghanstan Government, he can NOT be tried by Afghanistan happyslug Mar 2012 #7
This analysis says the status is equivalent to embassy personnel muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #12
No fucking way leftynyc Mar 2012 #9
anyone who thinks the military will give him a fair trial is dreaming, too.... mike_c Mar 2012 #18
Are you absolutely sure leftynyc Mar 2012 #21
I think the people he harmed have a greater interest in seeing justice... mike_c Mar 2012 #23
Wrong - his actions leftynyc Mar 2012 #28
You're the one wanting special treatment for him *because* he's in the military muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #30
Of course not leftynyc Mar 2012 #32
You compared them in #28 muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #33
Not inconsistent in WHO should leftynyc Mar 2012 #35
but he was not acting in the context of his military mission.... mike_c Mar 2012 #39
Sorry, I couldn 't read past leftynyc Mar 2012 #40
so what, just another day on the job? mike_c Mar 2012 #41
?, USA, USA, USA!!! webDude Mar 2012 #4
Tried in Afghanistan could mean tried by the US Military in Afganistan karynnj Mar 2012 #8
First we need to find out leftynyc Mar 2012 #10
I don't think I am anti-military and everything I wrote suggests US juristiction karynnj Mar 2012 #13
I wasn't speaking of you specifically leftynyc Mar 2012 #14
I have not heard a single person in our governmant ever say that Karzai's government should try him karynnj Mar 2012 #26
Is Karzai not the head of the leftynyc Mar 2012 #29
Some in our government want the Afghanis to try him? I haven't read that karynnj Mar 2012 #34
Nobody in our government leftynyc Mar 2012 #36
So, could Afghanistan blow him away with a drone missile strike? gratuitous Mar 2012 #3
That works for me. Nihil Mar 2012 #6
Do you think that's a good idea? leftynyc Mar 2012 #11
No, I don't think it's a particularly good idea gratuitous Mar 2012 #15
I understand your position and leftynyc Mar 2012 #16
Our government doesn't exactly have clean hands, either gratuitous Mar 2012 #17
I don't think we have to be perfect leftynyc Mar 2012 #19
Yep. I've seen that 'thinking' time and time again. Solly Mack Mar 2012 #20
I have the following moral distinction. Igel Mar 2012 #37
No sylvi Mar 2012 #24
Ah, I see gratuitous Mar 2012 #25
You asked what the difference is and would it be justified sylvi Mar 2012 #27
Air-drop his murdering ass naked out of a C130 NickB79 Mar 2012 #22
I think he deserves actual justice, starting with a psychiatric examination slackmaster Mar 2012 #31
How craven a political/military policy rusty fender Mar 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Afghanistan massacre susp...»Reply #26