Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

OnyxCollie

(9,958 posts)
18. Undermining torture investigations is how Obama rolls.
Wed Mar 12, 2014, 08:30 PM
Mar 2014

Obama called on the former general chairman of the RNC to stop Spain's investigation of US torture crimes.

WikiLeaks: How U.S. tried to stop Spain's torture probe
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/12/25/105786/wikileaks-how-us-tried-to-stop.html

MIAMI — It was three months into Barack Obama's presidency, and the administration -- under pressure to do something about alleged abuses in Bush-era interrogation policies -- turned to a Florida senator to deliver a sensitive message to Spain:

Don't indict former President George W. Bush's legal brain trust for alleged torture in the treatment of war on terror detainees, warned Mel Martinez on one of his frequent trips to Madrid. Doing so would chill U.S.-Spanish relations.



US embassy cables: Don't pursue Guantánamo criminal case, says Spanish attorney general
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/202776?INTCMP=SRCH

6. (C) As reported in SEPTEL, Senator Mel Martinez, accompanied by the Charge d'Affaires, met Acting FM Angel Lossada during a visit to the Spanish MFA on April 15. Martinez and the Charge underscored that the prosecutions would not be understood or accepted in the U.S. and would have an enormous impact on the bilateral relationship. The Senator also asked if the GOS had thoroughly considered the source of the material on which the allegations were based to ensure the charges were not based on misinformation or factually wrong statements. Lossada responded that the GOS recognized all of the complications presented by universal jurisdiction, but that the independence of the judiciary and the process must be respected. The GOS would use all appropriate legal tools in the matter. While it did not have much margin to operate, the GOS would advise Conde Pumpido that the official administration position was that the GOS was "not in accord with the National Court." Lossada reiterated to Martinez that the executive branch of government could not close any judicial investigation and urged that this case not affect the overall relationship, adding that our interests were much broader, and that the universal jurisdiction case should not be viewed as a reflection of the GOS position.



Judd Gregg, Obama's Republican nominee for Commerce secretary, didn't like the investigations either.

US embassy cables: Don't pursue Guantánamo criminal case, says Spanish attorney general
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/202776?INTCMP=SRCH

4. (C) As reported in REF A, Senator Judd Gregg, accompanied by the Charge d'Affaires, raised the issue with Luis Felipe Fernandez de la Pena, Director General Policy Director for North America and Europe during a visit to the Spanish MFA on April 13. Senator Gregg expressed his concern about the case. Fernandez de la Pena lamented this development, adding that judicial independence notwithstanding, the MFA disagreed with efforts to apply universal jurisdiction in such cases.



Why the aversion? To protect Bushco, of course!

US embassy cables: Spanish prosecutor weighs Guantánamo criminal case against US officials
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/200177

The fact that this complaint targets former Administration legal officials may reflect a "stepping-stone" strategy designed to pave the way for complaints against even more senior officials.



Eric Holder got the message.

Holder Says He Will Not Permit the Criminalization of Policy Differences
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7410267&page=1

As lawmakers call for hearings and debate brews over forming commissions to examine the Bush administration's policies on harsh interrogation techniques, Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed to a House panel that intelligence officials who relied on legal advice from the Bush-era Justice Department would not be prosecuted.

"Those intelligence community officials who acted reasonably and in good faith and in reliance on Department of Justice opinions are not going to be prosecuted,"
he told members of a House Appropriations Subcommittee, reaffirming the White House sentiment. "It would not be fair, in my view, to bring such prosecutions."



CIA Exhales: 99 Out of 101 Torture Cases Dropped
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/06/cia-exhales-99-out-of-101-torture-cases-dropped/

This is how one of the darkest chapters in U.S. counterterrorism ends: with practically every instance of suspected CIA torture dodging criminal scrutiny. It’s one of the greatest gifts the Justice Department could have given the CIA as David Petraeus takes over the agency.

Over two years after Attorney General Eric Holder instructed a special prosecutor, John Durham, to “preliminar(ily) review” whether CIA interrogators unlawfully tortured detainees in their custody, Holder announced on Thursday afternoon that he’ll pursue criminal investigations in precisely two out of 101 cases of suspected detainee abuse. Some of them turned out not to have involved CIA officials after all. Both of the cases that move on to a criminal phase involved the “death in custody” of detainees, Holder said.

But just because there’s a further criminal inquiry doesn’t necessarily mean there will be any charges brought against CIA officials involved in those deaths. If Holder’s decision on Thursday doesn’t actually end the Justice Department’s review of torture in CIA facilities, it brings it awfully close, as outgoing CIA Director Leon Panetta noted.

“On this, my last day as Director, I welcome the news that the broader inquiries are behind us,” Panetta wrote to the CIA staff on Thursday. “We are now finally about to close this chapter of our Agency’s history.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess those Dem Senators just don't understand Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #1
Remember, to be a powerful President, you must feign utter powerlessness in the face of villager Mar 2014 #26
Of course he won't montanacowboy Mar 2014 #2
How can you attack our President so irresponsibly? Dem4ever27 Mar 2014 #5
Hello. bigwillq Mar 2014 #7
Beneath him to uphold the rule of law? JoeyT Mar 2014 #9
Like it was beneath him to put thieving banksters in jail? jtuck004 Mar 2014 #14
I have a feeling you are not joking. There is a huge different between "skewer[ing]" a former rhett o rick Mar 2014 #22
I second that feeling. n/t crim son Mar 2014 #30
There's the triangulating Obama I know I wish didn't speak. Thanks for (not) reigning in another Nanjing to Seoul Mar 2014 #3
Says their lawyers. Fearless Mar 2014 #4
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that he would try to finesse this problem tularetom Mar 2014 #6
Holy #%^* MannyGoldstein Mar 2014 #8
In other words, "please let them resolve this themselves cause I sure don't want to be involved!" riderinthestorm Mar 2014 #10
Pretty much. 840high Mar 2014 #11
Looks as if Maureen Dowd was right. nt grasswire Mar 2014 #12
Courageous stand 1000words Mar 2014 #13
He wont get involved because he told us to look forward frwrfpos Mar 2014 #15
Question might be dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #16
I see what he did there. OnyxCollie Mar 2014 #17
Undermining torture investigations is how Obama rolls. OnyxCollie Mar 2014 #18
Only acting under orders is so WW2 dipsydoodle Mar 2014 #19
"Change" you can beLIEve in, bay-bee! blkmusclmachine Mar 2014 #20
He's worried about the voters' "meh" attitude in the midterms Doctor_J Mar 2014 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Autumn Mar 2014 #23
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #24
Wouldn't be prudent. jsr Mar 2014 #25
Well, now we know where he stands Kelvin Mace Mar 2014 #27
The problem seems to me that Obama is ignoring the law for purely political reasons Fortinbras Armstrong Mar 2014 #28
"Wading into it" is his JOB. n/t Psephos Mar 2014 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama: White House won't ...»Reply #18