Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
the bastards need to be investigated for fraud, and stripped of those web URL's groundloop Feb 2014 #1
Won't Happen chuckstevens Feb 2014 #11
Critters?? tosh Feb 2014 #2
Yeah, I was in a rush…I'm multi-tasking today, and just wanted to get it posted. Here are some silvershadow Feb 2014 #5
Fucksticks is my perferred term. 47of74 Feb 2014 #10
ROFL! I like Fucksticks too! ROFL! 2banon Feb 2014 #18
They are criminal asshole fucksticks. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #24
shitters comes to mind frylock Feb 2014 #8
Stephen King fan eh? Flying Squirrel Feb 2014 #21
haha! frylock Feb 2014 #22
Shitweasels? From Dreamcatchers. Enthusiast Feb 2014 #25
(just replace the "cr" with "sh" and you got it to a tee) lastlib Feb 2014 #12
Yay, GOOGLE! Warpy Feb 2014 #3
I just went to the site without seeing the warning. Control-Z Feb 2014 #26
like the Christie crowd, they just cannot help overreaching Skittles Feb 2014 #4
I would think they have over-reached so far at this point they can't avoid criminal charges. silvershadow Feb 2014 #6
"Never go further than far too far..." mac56 Feb 2014 #7
How lovely. Just exactly what they deserve. truthisfreedom Feb 2014 #9
Why I do declar'uh. Titonwan Feb 2014 #13
Netcraft anti phishing bar doesn't have this blocked yet PatrynXX Feb 2014 #14
Google Chrome isn't giving any warning either. nt bananas Feb 2014 #19
"contribute.sinemaforcongress.com" is another one bananas Feb 2014 #20
I wonder if this kind of thing could somehow rise to the level of RICO violations? nt silvershadow Feb 2014 #23
Good. blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #15
Glad to hear Google did this davidpdx Feb 2014 #16
K&R!!!! Cha Feb 2014 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Google slaps phishing war...»Reply #25