Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Arizona House Votes To Repeal Gun-Free School Zones [View all]Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)40. But you have it NRA-backward. See, more guns = less crime. Ergo,
everyone armed = no crime. And no one would ever be "sitting in the middle of a gun fight". Everyone will be participating!
The place is run by Jan Brewer and Sheriff Joe. You expect it to be civilized?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Except anyone who understands English grammer would agree that the right of individuals to own and
nanabugg
Mar 2012
#56
It gives police the authority to stop them 1000 yards away instead of after they are in the school
saras
Mar 2012
#15
1,000 feet. 333 yards, which is well within the effective range of a basic deer rifle.
krispos42
Mar 2012
#74
"Just because you can voice your opinion doesn't mean you should"? Welcome to DU?
uppityperson
Mar 2012
#17
Did someone take away your right to use carriage returns to denote paragraphs? n/t
Ian David
Mar 2012
#36
The government doesn't have the authority to regulate property it doesn't own????
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2012
#67
Luckily in DU3, you can hide that place along with 9/11ville, I/Pburg, and Conspiracyville.
onehandle
Mar 2012
#26
And a sign that says 'no guns' and a hypothetical penalty for a crime much less severe than actual
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2012
#33
Just wondering did this law effect people who owned a home within 1000 feet? Also is there anything
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#27
I didnt ask for what you or anyone here would expect but rather what were the actual effects if any.
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#45
Absent any other response, I'd say: It made the overly credulous feel better
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2012
#65
I would support allowing guns within the school zone provided the remain in a car...
Ian David
Mar 2012
#37
One irony about the gun nuts is that if it weren't for the hippies they detest,
Doctor_J
Mar 2012
#41
I'm still waiting for someone to explain how gun 'bans' keep out people with guns who don't
sikorsky
Mar 2012
#46
So you support the notion that no one has ever been killed accidently by a gun?
Thor_MN
Mar 2012
#57
I don't disagree with anything you wrote except the part where you assume you know what I
sikorsky
Mar 2012
#70
They dont but the other extreme end of the spectrum of advocating that people carry
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#58
I never advocated for people to carry guns who didn't want to. Your straw man is dead.
sikorsky
Mar 2012
#71
" I never advocated" Good thing I never said that you were advocating it then.
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#73
My UNI is a "Gun free zone", some guy was just mugged at gun point in the parking lot a few days ago
Kurska
Mar 2012
#43
What asseration would that be exactly? That murders will continue to happen regardless of if people
cstanleytech
Mar 2012
#87
start with the fucking title of this thread and go from there. You'll figure it out.
DisgustipatedinCA
Mar 2012
#89
Looks like all the states having the face time on the TV box has overwhelmed
lonestarnot
Mar 2012
#88