Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For R [View all]mallard
(569 posts)... and you are sincere only in knowing what you want everyone to believe. It is a version compatible with the official one, which you admit involves lies ... apparently to maintain a margin of credibility. We can only agree that Bush was an idiot, not that he may have been duped.
"They were NOT like a controlled demolition."
They were like nothing other than controlled demolitions. What else would a controled demolition look like, please? Have you not seen the collapse of WTC7?
You claim the Saudis MUST have done it because their people were told to leave and ... took off like guilty people would. Is that not perhaps how things were made to look, along with 16 Saudi faces up on the media within hours as the accused? That's really not exactly strong evidence.
Too bad you won't reveal reasons for your dedicated loyalty to upholding the BS official line, thus indirectly to actual parties responsible and all their successful NWO neocon pals.
You talk about belief in science and evidence but don't provide much. The fires weren't even hot enough to melt steel.