Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Link To Saudi Arabia Is Topic Of 28 Redacted Pages In Government Report; Congressmen Push For R [View all]Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Of course, there's a lot of evidence we'll never have the benefit of, because the steel was shipped out as soon as possible--shipped from one of the biggest crime scenese since the Jonestown Massacre. I ask you: WHO benefits from the immediate disposal of evidence at the crime scene?
And then there's the evidence of military grade thermite at the scene, and months of molten metal cooling at the scene. (You don't get molten metal with a fire caused by the burning of jet fuel, or even the burning of the building and it's contents.)
And then there's the over 2000 engineering and architectural professionals who provide testimony that the planes could not have caused the collapse of the buildings, and Building Seven, itself, which was not hit by a plane at all, collapsing. In fact, this is the first time in history that not one, not two, but three steel frame buildings have ever collapsed because of fire.
You are asking us to suspend belief in the laws of physics, and instead, believe only certain evidence, all the while, hiding other evidence behind the excuse of "national security."
I think not.