Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cstanleytech

(26,273 posts)

27. None that I am aware of but its just that imo the invoking of Bush/Cheney

Reply to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #25)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 10:27 PM

Feb 2012

at the drop of a hat in a kind of childish "but they started it" like whine has just gotten repetitive.
But hey who am I to argue with people wanting to relive their 2nd childhood *shrug*

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton: Syria's Assad could be labeled a war criminal [View all] IDemo Feb 2012 OP

So could Bush & Cheney Hugabear Feb 2012 #1

Exactly, so I don't think she should be going there unless Obama plans to put teddy51 Feb 2012 #2

we let our war criminals skate. so there went any credibility we had leftyohiolib Feb 2012 #6

Looking into the wrong mirror? Dack Feb 2012 #11

In fact, if they intervene militarily in Syria without a proper UN resolution that would in itself Fool Count Feb 2012 #13

"Put the former Republican administration on trial for war crimes?" Or at least send to teddy51 Feb 2012 #14

+1 n/t Purveyor Feb 2012 #4

Agreed! Lint Head Feb 2012 #8

+1K and-justice-for-all Feb 2012 #16

Bringing up Bush and Cheney whenever war crimes are mentioned is really getting old. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #18

Yeah, we should just forget about them.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #22

Yes of course. Thats exactly what I said after all cstanleytech Feb 2012 #26

My point being that once we stop mentioning them every time war crimes are brought up.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #28

No, they wont be forgotten. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #30

It's the hypocrisy.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #32

Hmm some good points you have though I still believe its getting a bit long in the tooth for people cstanleytech Feb 2012 #33

Whats the statute of limitation on war crimes? Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #25

None that I am aware of but its just that imo the invoking of Bush/Cheney cstanleytech Feb 2012 #27

Yeah. My 2nd childhood involved thousands of dead people too. Ruby the Liberal Feb 2012 #35

Are you sure you dont mean horses? cstanleytech Feb 2012 #38

Let's try looking at ourselves Phlem Feb 2012 #3

Yeah, I'm not sure we should be waving that wand around. sofa king Feb 2012 #5

I so disagree. cstanleytech Feb 2012 #19

of course Phlem Feb 2012 #20

I dont think there is any government on this planet that doesnt practice its share of cstanleytech Feb 2012 #21

yes but the USA pretends to be the world's peacekeeper, Phlem Feb 2012 #23

Ya know I have seen people claim that cstanleytech Feb 2012 #29

The government will never Phlem Feb 2012 #31

She's the SOS, not the Attorney General. Beacool Feb 2012 #34

An absolutely cringe-worthy quote, Madam Secretary... BadtotheboneBob Feb 2012 #7

Who is Syria at war with? gratuitous Feb 2012 #9

"Could be" How about "should be," or even better, "is" (nt) apnu Feb 2012 #10

Why bother... just have Obama put him on our hit list. tk2kewl Feb 2012 #12

That's actually a pretty watered-down statement, considering her recent bellicose comments. David__77 Feb 2012 #15

Fine Hillary DonCoquixote Feb 2012 #17

We should listen to Hillary.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #24

So what? This country's own war criminals are still walking free. BlueStater Feb 2012 #36

"Crimes against humanity" maybe but "war criminal" from her is just a sick joke. Nihil Feb 2012 #37