Latest Breaking News

ProfessionalLeftist

(4,982 posts)

25. So yea, I guess they did

Reply to villager (Original post)

Tue Feb 28, 2012, 02:18 AM

Feb 2012

http://www.democraticunderground.com/101462096

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

74 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AP source: Israel will keep US out of the loop if it decides to strike Iran’s nuclear program [View all] villager Feb 2012 OP

Then the US should tell Israel that there on there own, period. If Russia or China take exception teddy51 Feb 2012 #1

they're, their. marybourg Feb 2012 #15

*aggressive boppers Feb 2012 #22

Maybe we should keep Isreal out of the loop of Foreign Aid Money DontTreadOnMe Feb 2012 #2

*Israel boppers Feb 2012 #23

Good. Keep us out of it altogether. MrSlayer Feb 2012 #3

There is only ONE way to stop an Israeli attack Bigmack Feb 2012 #4

If the President did that customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #10

It sounds like a great idea to me. Israel, if you bomb Iran you are on your own. No money & no help peacebird Feb 2012 #28

I doubt that... ecstatic Feb 2012 #36

The Jews who are going to vote for Obama will, those who have already decided they will not nanabugg Mar 2012 #66

The Jewish vote is not monolithic. AIPAC supporters may leave, though. Selatius Mar 2012 #74

While I'm sure that would leftynyc Feb 2012 #40

I think that he/she meant "blankety-blanks." The Stranger Feb 2012 #43

Any idea leftynyc Feb 2012 #45

No The Stranger Feb 2012 #49

Maybe they are related to the 'blah' people Santorum talks about? nt msanthrope Mar 2012 #71

Why are you censoring yourself using terms like "Blank blanks" former9thward Mar 2012 #58

Good. If Israel thinks the threat is worth their blood and treasure, than they should attack. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #5

US will stay out for about 3 minutes. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #7

We'll be drawn into it instantly customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #12

"...the usual half measures we take when trying to fight a PC war." ??? Please elaborate. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #16

If we go into a war customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #18

I see. 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #20

The vast majority of the wars we've been involved in customerserviceguy Feb 2012 #21

Great scene, great movie! amandabeech Feb 2012 #35

If you mean WW3, then yes, it CAN be ruled out. AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #54

US involvement puts Israel in grave danger. napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #13

I really like this. indivisibleman Feb 2012 #17

A man has to have some poetic license, doesn't he? napoleon_in_rags Feb 2012 #19

Ron Paul SkyDaddy7 Feb 2012 #34

?? He wants to bring all the troops home and mind our own business. CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #42

Not worth it to me! SkyDaddy7 Mar 2012 #53

Confusing CAPHAVOC Mar 2012 #65

Mind my own business? LOL! SkyDaddy7 Mar 2012 #69

True, but he'll also destroy programs like Social Security, Medicare, public education, etc. Selatius Mar 2012 #72

Now that is a true reply... n/t Tripod Mar 2012 #63

Let the Israelis do it themselves. hrmjustin Feb 2012 #6

lmfao! Earth_First Feb 2012 #8

Plausible Deniability is the cat's meow these daze. 99th_Monkey Feb 2012 #9

Armegeddon CAPHAVOC Feb 2012 #11

Apocalypse Too? 99th_Monkey Feb 2012 #14

Oh, PUH-LEEZE, you two. AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #55

Deniability is not plausible, unless you imagine that US intelligence is completely incompetent FarCenter Feb 2012 #38

No there is another way to stop Israel lovuian Feb 2012 #24

So yea, I guess they did ProfessionalLeftist Feb 2012 #25

They Will Time the Attack to Cause Maximum Damage to Obama's Re-election Chances AndyTiedye Feb 2012 #26

You are basing this on...? Behind the Aegis Feb 2012 #27

Agreed.nt cstanleytech Feb 2012 #30

Just like the claims of imminent WW3?(Which is REAL paranoid nonsense, btw.) AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #57

He may be no friend but that doesn't amount to conspiracy to affect our elections. Behind the Aegis Mar 2012 #60

Ah, perhaps not. AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #61

I honestly don't think that Ron Paul would even TRY to stop Israel. AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #56

If RP Were the GOP Nominee, Obama Would Have a Lot More Leverage with Israel AndyTiedye Mar 2012 #64

Doesnt matter imo as there will still be unreasonable people who bash the US and claim its still cstanleytech Feb 2012 #29

I'd like a doughnut please Brettongarcia Feb 2012 #32

So would I :( cstanleytech Feb 2012 #33

Just think of it as a militarized Super PAC (nt) muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #31

If they do atreides1 Feb 2012 #37

Several options Lurks Often Feb 2012 #39

Reading threads like this one proves leftynyc Feb 2012 #41

I DO NOT think I know EVERYTHING Bigmack Feb 2012 #44

I said NOTHING about US involvement leftynyc Feb 2012 #46

Iraq is likely to oppose at this point. Its Shia majority has ties to people in Iran. Selatius Mar 2012 #73

Cut their fucking military funding already snooper2 Feb 2012 #47

As long as the US isn't Centrik Feb 2012 #48

US warships running at flank speed out of the Persian Gulf Strelnikov_ Feb 2012 #50

Yum! RUMMYisFROSTED Feb 2012 #51

NYT: U.S. Sees Iran Attacks as Likely if Israel Strikes alp227 Feb 2012 #52

The right wingers in the US are salivating for a war with Iran Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #59

Ironic, because many on the right are screaming about an imminent 3rd World War at the same time.... AverageJoe90 Mar 2012 #62

We have to win the election Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #68

It just sickens me to hear Graham and the RW-AIPAC cabal talk about what they will nanabugg Mar 2012 #67

Will they keep our troops blood out of the loop afterwards also? Marrah_G Mar 2012 #70