Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: N.S.A. Examines Social Networks of U.S. Citizens (Decision Made In Secret 2010) [View all]blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)30. Change You Can BeLIEve In!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
N.S.A. Examines Social Networks of U.S. Citizens (Decision Made In Secret 2010) [View all]
kpete
Sep 2013
OP
Love this exception: "or there is evidence of a crime." So much for Title III warrant requirements -
leveymg
Sep 2013
#5
Of course not. The CIA was "ontop" of them, just like the 9/11 hijackers and '93 WTC bombers before
leveymg
Sep 2013
#7
It means that we're all expendable, if the CIA and the WH think that's necessary.
leveymg
Sep 2013
#9
That's the thing about amassing all this information - they can only work backwards,
djean111
Sep 2013
#28
Yep, they are everywhere and will continue to be, maybe some should spend time and effort in
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#4
One should be albe to figure out what is being done by the analysts but be that as it may be
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#16
Or terrorist could be those who attempt to scare the crap out of those paranoid about
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#20
I don't know the number of paranoid spy people who is scaring the crap out of those who listen to
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#24
I asked you to please tell me what percentage of Americans you believe are terrorists
JDPriestly
Sep 2013
#33
By your definition most people are terrorist as you say a terrorist can be someone in disagreement
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#37
I do not agree with defining terrorism as anyone who disagrees with me or others.
JDPriestly
Sep 2013
#38
Then you are disagreeing with your earlier post. I disagree with your opinion of NSA so
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#39
I am saying that the NSA definition of terrorism if taken from the Patriot Act could stretch to
JDPriestly
Sep 2013
#40
Do you think the soft target attack occurred in Nairobi? Do you think there was a bombing
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#41
Does "citing a foreign intelligence justification" include planning a trip outwith the USA?
mwooldri
Sep 2013
#10
The stories of your extra girl friends seem to come to the surface long before the NSA was created.
Thinkingabout
Sep 2013
#17
The article mentions facebook profiles so does this mean facebook gave the government a backdoor
cstanleytech
Sep 2013
#21