Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: NY high court eyes who can tap Starbucks' tip jars [View all]joeglow3
(6,228 posts)25. Okay we are in agreement
However, the position of the court case is that shift supervisors should NOT get them. I disagree with that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
39 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If that's the case then the customer should know they aren't tipping the workers.
AtheistCrusader
May 2013
#23
Anyone that gives work assignments or takes disciplinary action is management and shouldn't
Skeeter Barnes
May 2013
#2
Even though the majority of their job is to serve the customers, thereby generating tips?
joeglow3
May 2013
#4
How fortunate you must be to have the option of turning down a promotion in that field. (nt)
Posteritatis
May 2013
#18
If these managers are underpaid, they need to take it up with their fellow members of mgmt.
Skeeter Barnes
May 2013
#14
Since when are employees in that industry even allowed to negotiate wages?
Posteritatis
May 2013
#20
They signed on to take action against their fellow workers on behalf of the company.
Skeeter Barnes
May 2013
#21