Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UPDATED WaPo: DOJ Spied On Fox News Reporter [View all]grantcart
(53,061 posts)74. I read it and Greenwalds recitation of the facts backs post 59
1) The investigation was not focusing on the reporter but on a state department leaker
2) The 'investigation' involved tracing back movement by the reporter in the State Department
and
3) Getting a warrant for 2 days of emails and all emails to Kim.
Now here is where Greenwald famously goes off the tracks, as he almost always does.
He characterizes the leaks as being nothing more than normal chit chat:
Kim did not obtain unauthorized access to classified information, nor steal documents, nor sell secrets, nor pass them to an enemy of the US. Instead, the DOJ alleges that he merely communicated this innocuous information to a journalist - something done every day in Washington
So you might want to read the links that Greenwald incorporates because they completely contradict his characterization. Here is what HIS linked source said was the offending reporting:
U.S. intelligence officials have warned President Obama and other senior American officials that North Korea intends to respond to the passage of a U.N. Security Council resolution this week -- condemning the communist country for its recent nuclear and ballistic missile tests -- with another nuclear test, FOX News has learned.
What's more, Pyongyang's next nuclear detonation is but one of four planned actions the Central Intelligence Agency has learned, through sources inside North Korea, that the regime of Kim Jong-Il intends to take -- but not announce -- once the Security Council resolution is officially passed, likely on Friday.
The other three actions include the reprocessing of all of the North's spent plutonium fuel rods into weapons-grade plutonium; a major escalation in the North's uranium-enrichment program; and the launching of another Taepodong-2 intercontinental ballistic missile from the Yunsong military complex on the west coast of North Korea. The North last launched a Taepodong-2 on April 5; it conducted its second nuclear test in the last three years on Memorial Day.
The intelligence community only learned of North Korea's plans this week, prompting CIA to alert senior officials. Asked who would be briefed on this kind of data, a source told FOX News: "The top people: POTUS, DNI." "POTUS" is acronym for the president of the United States; "DNI" refers to the director of the Office of National Intelligence.
Read more: http://politics.blogs.foxnews.com/node/1419#ixzz2TqoXkI1B
So it was not, as Greenwald says, everyday non classified material, but highly sensitive material that also discloses that the source of the information came from a source within North Korea, which, obviously, is something that is highly sensitive and very likely to have terrible consequences for the source and future attempts by the US to get good information.
As usual Greenwald cherry picks his points.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
148 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You do realize that Fox "News" supported this kind of activity during the Bush administration.
W T F
May 2013
#50
Fox has defended lawsuits where they were sued for reporting false info with the claim that they are
okaawhatever
May 2013
#113
Justice Department officals went to a Federal magistrate and obtained a search warrant
Cali_Democrat
May 2013
#136
are we talking about Freedom of the Press, or freedom to disseminate false information?
olddad56
May 2013
#80
Not only that, there wasn't any wiretapping. They used badge logs and narrowed it down from 95
okaawhatever
May 2013
#112
You do realize this information was available Nov 2011 and was only reported today. A little bit
okaawhatever
May 2013
#110
Justice Department officals went to a Federal magistrate and otained a search warrant
Cali_Democrat
May 2013
#137
"AP Leak ended informant's rare opportunity, why DOJ went after AP records"
emulatorloo
May 2013
#108
When someone is stupid enough to use Government phones and email they deserve scrutiny.
gordianot
May 2013
#16
So can a reporter or leaker never do any harm and always be immune from the law?
CJCRANE
May 2013
#35
Fair enough. But reporters can ruin their careers if they report false information. nt
CJCRANE
May 2013
#72
I don't mean to be rude to WAPO, but reviewing government records is NOT "spying."
MADem
May 2013
#49
Looks less like spying on FOX and more like spying on the CIA. People get killed from leaks.
freshwest
May 2013
#119
According to doj yes. One problem is there aren't good laws right now. Most go back to the Espionage
okaawhatever
May 2013
#114
If a reporter is passing national security secrets to a foreign country, how should it be handled...
WhoWoodaKnew
May 2013
#102
Why this reporter? Because he was the one that received classified information from Kim
Cali_Democrat
May 2013
#138
If the intelligence concerns events in the past, I see little problem with news media
JDPriestly
May 2013
#120