Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
75. Yes, this is a major factor in maintaining all school activities, including sports.
Wed May 8, 2013, 02:09 AM
May 2013

That loss is a reason why schools demand kids that are enrolled go to school on time, too. If they are not in their homeroom class at a certain time, the school isn't paid, even if they show up and attend all the classes later.

At least that was the way it was when I attended in Texas. The morning roll call determined the amount the state paid the school to operate in its entirety. If these kids just show up for one class or after school for sports, the school is not getting paid for it...

Unless this new law counts their showing up past the tardy time, but still pays for the entire day. Which I doubt that they have the money for, since they are laying people off. I think this is just more to hurt the public schools where they have laid off so many teachers, not based on school failures, even though the number of students has not gone down.

Possibly charter school lobbyists are pushing this in order to make their case for more profit as the public schools go without.

JMHO. Not a school employee.

I'm female and have never played football, but don't most schools have a rule that... Tx4obama May 2013 #1
Maybe that's why standardized testing is so important cprise May 2013 #10
This should kill any such eligiblity requirements. surrealAmerican May 2013 #58
I thought they had to follow some of the state cirriculum and make reports to the state. freshwest May 2013 #73
Not Texas. Igel May 2013 #90
'...a curriculum that includes reading, arithmetic, and some sort of civics is all that's required' freshwest May 2013 #93
So the next big lawsuit can be murielm99 May 2013 #85
excellent point dlwickham May 2013 #94
I believe one of the big problems with education today is the emphasis on SPORTS AndyA May 2013 #2
What Does A Football Coach At A Football Power Get Paid DallasNE May 2013 #8
Ditto and also, what about music and arts programs? Why doesn't this bill include that winterpark May 2013 #16
YEA!! get the red out May 2013 #29
And yet this still misses an important point. Igel May 2013 #91
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton May 2013 #3
Instant legal challenge TheLion May 2013 #4
On what basis? freshwest May 2013 #74
i think the bigger problem is the potential for abuse, e.g., redshirting unblock May 2013 #5
That's what I said when this bill was proposed in Virginia... Blue_Tires May 2013 #14
There are age restrictions for high school sports and probably in each state LiberalFighter May 2013 #44
People already delay kindergarten a year so their boys will be bigger in high school pstokely May 2013 #89
In Texas specifically and most likely in other states it does matter. LiberalFighter May 2013 #95
But they can be 19 on Sept 2 pstokely May 2013 #96
Did I say otherwise?????????????????????????? LiberalFighter May 2013 #97
The "moreover"s are already happening, but not in football jmowreader May 2013 #56
So, you create the problem you have with home-schooling joeglow3 May 2013 #6
The next step would be students attending parochial schools LiberalFighter May 2013 #45
Which courts have ruled in many places they can joeglow3 May 2013 #54
This doesn't take into account... RevStPatrick May 2013 #7
They should have a 'home school team/league' ... Myrina May 2013 #9
Because they pay property taxes and their kids are entitled to those benefits joeglow3 May 2013 #11
Tough shit. It was their choice not to attend the school. All or nothing. MotherPetrie May 2013 #12
We use private school and got speech therapy from our local public school joeglow3 May 2013 #13
No, I don't like parents giving the middle finger to the public school system and then expecting it MotherPetrie May 2013 #36
Our parochial schools save the public schools over $200 MILLION a year joeglow3 May 2013 #55
Agreed. If it's good enough for sports, it's good enough for education. Myrina May 2013 #15
what is the logic behind your view? joeglow3 May 2013 #24
+1 hamsterjill May 2013 #28
True, they pay taxes but... JNelson6563 May 2013 #19
The vast majority of funding comes from local property taxes joeglow3 May 2013 #21
Ok, apparently it's different in Michigan JNelson6563 May 2013 #23
CA only gives schools money based on number of students enrolled AND actually attending classes. SunSeeker May 2013 #26
SAME IN TEXAS elehhhhna May 2013 #53
Their property taxes don't go to the school unless their kid is ATTENDING CLASSES at the school. SunSeeker May 2013 #34
Then, it varies by state joeglow3 May 2013 #64
Arizona law, like other states, funds schools based on attendance, regardless of property taxes. SunSeeker May 2013 #68
We actually live in the highest taxed district in the state joeglow3 May 2013 #72
Yes, this is a major factor in maintaining all school activities, including sports. freshwest May 2013 #75
So do people who send their kids to private school treestar May 2013 #57
You don't even need that when you have the AAU Blue_Tires May 2013 #17
Going to be interesting austinlw May 2013 #18
Why is it a big deal? dbackjon May 2013 #20
Does the school get extra funding to cover the homeschoolers' use of the facilities? nt SunSeeker May 2013 #27
For the classes, yes dbackjon May 2013 #31
So the homeschoolers' use of the rec facilities goes unfunded? That hurts the rest of the kids. SunSeeker May 2013 #33
No - at least in most districts, you have to pay an activity fee to use the facilities/programs dbackjon May 2013 #37
But the school's students also pay those fees, on top of funding the school by their attendance. SunSeeker May 2013 #39
Property Taxes dbackjon May 2013 #41
Property taxes don't pay for upkeep and operation, attendance does. SunSeeker May 2013 #46
My experience was limited to Flagstaff dbackjon May 2013 #48
I did read your posts and the links. Arizona does not have any special requirements. SunSeeker May 2013 #49
Can my daughter attend one public school for academics but play sports for another public school? JoePhilly May 2013 #22
Not same situation dbackjon May 2013 #32
Why not? Get your education in one location, participate in sports at another. JoePhilly May 2013 #35
Because one is a formal school, the other is a home dbackjon May 2013 #38
Would make an interesting legal argument and could be an kiranon May 2013 #42
Kids in Public HS here have alot of rules on what makes them eligible to play. Marrah_G May 2013 #25
We have no pass, no play Ishoutandscream2 May 2013 #30
It doesn't have to take it to be the right wing to... TRoN33 May 2013 #40
I found an article about home schooling and sports timdog44 May 2013 #43
I can't imagine they could play for a school outside their district.... Fastcars May 2013 #47
Why are people surprised that football is more important than education in Texas? Snake Plissken May 2013 #50
Public schools are for the kids. ZombieHorde May 2013 #51
I wish you had the last word on this subject. Inkfreak May 2013 #81
Home schooling parents pay taxes and should be able to avail themselves of some school activities. searchingforlight May 2013 #52
So if they pay the taxes, why don't they send their kids to public schools for the full package? mac56 May 2013 #59
Why have the whole package when part of it is broken? The Straight Story May 2013 #61
Soo.... cherry-pick the parts you don't think are "broken"? mac56 May 2013 #63
When it comes to your kids, maybe a crappy school and education is no biggie to some The Straight Story May 2013 #65
Just because they "can" doesn't mean they "should." mac56 May 2013 #66
So you aren't pro-choice. Psephos May 2013 #71
You keep using that word. mac56 May 2013 #79
Umm, I only posted once in here. Psephos May 2013 #88
"if the school is good enough for sports, it's good enough for education." Shrek May 2013 #83
I don't understand your logic. noamnety May 2013 #86
I agree with you with that 85% estimate duhneece May 2013 #60
This could be the only normal social behavior they get exposed to. ileus May 2013 #62
Eliminate school sports. Dawson Leery May 2013 #67
+1 million n/t A Little Weird May 2013 #69
Home skool jocks living off the public school teat. blkmusclmachine May 2013 #70
But it's a chance to defacto7 May 2013 #76
^ THIS ^ mac56 May 2013 #80
The reaction to this idea seems pretty petty to me. dkf May 2013 #77
Umm representing a school they don't attend... uriel1972 May 2013 #78
" I'm not entirely against home-schooling" - really? demwing May 2013 #82
And Vonnegut says, "told ya so." sofa king May 2013 #84
We do this in Massachusetts now and I haven't seen any problems with it. hughee99 May 2013 #87
Strange attitude. Igel May 2013 #92
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»The Texas Senate approved...»Reply #75