Latest Breaking News

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)

59. you just agreed with me. Looking back, tis easy to see and make sure NEVER AGAIN

Reply to blackspade (Reply #58)

Fri May 3, 2013, 08:57 AM

May 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Department to appeal judge's Plan B order [View all] Pale Blue Dot May 2013 OP

It is so frustrating that this administration, when it can act without obstruction Warren Stupidity May 2013 #1

Just like it's still 2008 MotherPetrie May 2013 #2

Oh, fuck me. Fuddnik May 2013 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #4

If they don't appeal, it doesn't go to the Supreme Court. End of story. Fuddnik May 2013 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #7

"2/3 of the nation?" PSPS May 2013 #8

2/3 of the states have republican governors. 80% of the people don't want it, but govs do. graham4anything May 2013 #11

So it's all a pissing contest over a woman's right to emergency contraception. Fuddnik May 2013 #9

No. But it has to be done correctly. Blame the judge that ruled the other day for the timing. graham4anything May 2013 #12

So you ask why wouldn't anyone want the President to have as much power as possible? First, because 24601 May 2013 #23

breaking news- Jefferson lied. Forget the BOR as they are preditated on a lie graham4anything May 2013 #24

You can rely on the original constitution if you want - I'll instead consider the amendments to be 24601 May 2013 #25

Then reinterpreting the 2nd should be right up your alley, I know it's up mine. graham4anything May 2013 #26

You need to re-read what I said. I offered nothing about Jefferson. But the post-civil war 24601 May 2013 #31

So he's doing to this show he's not weak? Doctor_J May 2013 #39

People don't want him to give them up. TheMadMonk May 2013 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #19

Your lack of understanding about the blackspade May 2013 #40

NH came a month before. graham4anything May 2013 #44

Nader has nothing to do with my comment about the 2000 election 'descision' blackspade May 2013 #45

Nader had everything to do with Bush being seated in 2000. November came before December. graham4anything May 2013 #47

What are you talking about? blackspade May 2013 #49

Nader got people NOT to vote. He told them why bother, both parties the same. graham4anything May 2013 #50

You are missing the point. blackspade May 2013 #51

Spin, rinse, repeat. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #20

This poster is needing more detergent every day though. Doctor_J May 2013 #38

Insane, isn't it? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #67

Fucking vomit inducing. idwiyo May 2013 #5

Yes, it is. And the other side effects include nausea, stomach pain, dizziness,... Pterodactyl May 2013 #16

But alternative is of course sooooo much better! Thanks for enlightening me. idwiyo May 2013 #18

You are quite welcome! Pterodactyl May 2013 #27

people do need to realise this med is just a higher dose of some regular type birth control pills. Sunlei May 2013 #30

Disgusting. Small Accumulates May 2013 #10

Does the DoJ sit around and think up ways of pissing the people off? IDemo May 2013 #13

It seems like it sometimes pediatricmedic May 2013 #15

You people flipping out over the headline, this doesn't affect yesterdays age change SpartanDem May 2013 #14

Which continues to keep barriers up to impede access. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #21

Are you saying they agree with the decision, they just wanted to say it themselves? muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #22

It's not a petty issue for the executive branch, SpartanDem May 2013 #32

If the DOJ wins, then couldn't the next administration just change the regulation? byeya May 2013 #33

Yes, but if they lose. You could be potentially be setting a precedent for a conservative judge SpartanDem May 2013 #34

Ordinarily I would prefer the FDA to rule on drugs and their availability and usage. Maybe that was byeya May 2013 #66

Part of the issue is.... blackspade May 2013 #41

As pointed out to another posted who made that same point SpartanDem May 2013 #42

That happens all the time. blackspade May 2013 #43

The judicial results doesn't mean overall legal reasoning is progressive SpartanDem May 2013 #52

I believe I pointed that out. blackspade May 2013 #54

If you don't want abortions & you don't want unwanted pregnancies, this pill is the best thing going judesedit May 2013 #28

Supposed you are the Pharmacist with a 15 year old female comes in accompanied by a 24601 May 2013 #63

Why? Why? Why? Myrina May 2013 #29

The President has ID'd himself as a Republican Doctor_J May 2013 #37

LBJ was more liberal than Bernie Sanders and the protesters took LBJ down graham4anything May 2013 #48

History fail. blackspade May 2013 #55

LBJ had 1000s of achievements. While others dreamed, LBJ did. I love LBJ! graham4anything May 2013 #57

Again, your understanding of history blackspade May 2013 #58

you just agreed with me. Looking back, tis easy to see and make sure NEVER AGAIN graham4anything May 2013 #59

We are definately not in agreement on the facts. blackspade May 2013 #60

More Justice Department stupidity. blackspade May 2013 #35

Unbelievable Doctor_J May 2013 #36

You have got to be kidding. n/t Laelth May 2013 #46

*facepalm* sakabatou May 2013 #53

Question: Why is it available only to women? Can't men buy it? Pterodactyl May 2013 #56

My understanding is that men can buy it, although some pharmacists have refused to sell it. n/t winter is coming May 2013 #65

That's just terrible! Pterodactyl May 2013 #69

Some pharmacists have claimed they are concerned men who buy it may be a pimp or rapist davidn3600 May 2013 #70

Do they feel 15 is not young enough? marshall May 2013 #61

I've never seen or heard any indication that there's an age restriction for Tylenol. winter is coming May 2013 #64

WTF!!! grahamhgreen May 2013 #62

geez, let women choose Plan B if Plan A didn't work - what is with this DOJ!? wordpix May 2013 #68