Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UMass: 1 arrested is suspended, 2 not enrolled [View all]mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)37. I used to teach Anthropology at Umass Dartmouth.
It was called Southeastern Mass State Univ at the time. I absolutely hated it there. Mostly because it is such a physically unappealing campus. It is entirely of concrete and looks like a high tech prison.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, you don't think civil restraining orders should ever be permitted, correct?
geek tragedy
May 2013
#15
No one should be forced to do anything without any standing of the law behind it.
harmonicon
May 2013
#18
Your Argument is Absurd. No Violation of Rights. A Judge Issues an Order. Not a School or LEO.
dballance
May 2013
#39
They could suspend him for not attending class. But if UMASS wants to be seen as tough on terrorism,
24601
May 2013
#11
You would prefer that accused rapists be allowed to attend class with their
geek tragedy
May 2013
#5
You said that an accusation is "no reason" to think someone committed a crime.
geek tragedy
May 2013
#27
geek_tragedy is assuredly trolling for a pissing match. Look up thread. He argued the other side.
dballance
May 2013
#41
So one of the threads on Latest Breaking News is about a women charged with lying to police about
24601
May 2013
#44
Allowed back into school, sure, but what about their time and other expenses?
harmonicon
May 2013
#34