Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
30. people do need to realise this med is just a higher dose of some regular type birth control pills.
Thu May 2, 2013, 09:56 AM
May 2013

On the streets this is a known fact and plenty of people use birth control pills at a 'morning after' dose.

I don't understand why any politican,any court or even the President wants American people to continue doing self medicating for "morning after" birth control.

Or even 'self abortions' using a catheter and a syringe.

Americans deserve the right to choose for themselves, and have Medical professionals assist them.

It is so frustrating that this administration, when it can act without obstruction Warren Stupidity May 2013 #1
Just like it's still 2008 MotherPetrie May 2013 #2
Oh, fuck me. Fuddnik May 2013 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #4
If they don't appeal, it doesn't go to the Supreme Court. End of story. Fuddnik May 2013 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #7
"2/3 of the nation?" PSPS May 2013 #8
2/3 of the states have republican governors. 80% of the people don't want it, but govs do. graham4anything May 2013 #11
So it's all a pissing contest over a woman's right to emergency contraception. Fuddnik May 2013 #9
No. But it has to be done correctly. Blame the judge that ruled the other day for the timing. graham4anything May 2013 #12
So you ask why wouldn't anyone want the President to have as much power as possible? First, because 24601 May 2013 #23
breaking news- Jefferson lied. Forget the BOR as they are preditated on a lie graham4anything May 2013 #24
You can rely on the original constitution if you want - I'll instead consider the amendments to be 24601 May 2013 #25
Then reinterpreting the 2nd should be right up your alley, I know it's up mine. graham4anything May 2013 #26
You need to re-read what I said. I offered nothing about Jefferson. But the post-civil war 24601 May 2013 #31
So he's doing to this show he's not weak? Doctor_J May 2013 #39
People don't want him to give them up. TheMadMonk May 2013 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author graham4anything May 2013 #19
Your lack of understanding about the blackspade May 2013 #40
NH came a month before. graham4anything May 2013 #44
Nader has nothing to do with my comment about the 2000 election 'descision' blackspade May 2013 #45
Nader had everything to do with Bush being seated in 2000. November came before December. graham4anything May 2013 #47
What are you talking about? blackspade May 2013 #49
Nader got people NOT to vote. He told them why bother, both parties the same. graham4anything May 2013 #50
You are missing the point. blackspade May 2013 #51
Spin, rinse, repeat. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #20
This poster is needing more detergent every day though. Doctor_J May 2013 #38
Insane, isn't it? SammyWinstonJack May 2013 #67
Fucking vomit inducing. idwiyo May 2013 #5
Yes, it is. And the other side effects include nausea, stomach pain, dizziness,... Pterodactyl May 2013 #16
But alternative is of course sooooo much better! Thanks for enlightening me. idwiyo May 2013 #18
You are quite welcome! Pterodactyl May 2013 #27
people do need to realise this med is just a higher dose of some regular type birth control pills. Sunlei May 2013 #30
Disgusting. Small Accumulates May 2013 #10
Does the DoJ sit around and think up ways of pissing the people off? IDemo May 2013 #13
It seems like it sometimes pediatricmedic May 2013 #15
You people flipping out over the headline, this doesn't affect yesterdays age change SpartanDem May 2013 #14
Which continues to keep barriers up to impede access. Warren Stupidity May 2013 #21
Are you saying they agree with the decision, they just wanted to say it themselves? muriel_volestrangler May 2013 #22
It's not a petty issue for the executive branch, SpartanDem May 2013 #32
If the DOJ wins, then couldn't the next administration just change the regulation? byeya May 2013 #33
Yes, but if they lose. You could be potentially be setting a precedent for a conservative judge SpartanDem May 2013 #34
Ordinarily I would prefer the FDA to rule on drugs and their availability and usage. Maybe that was byeya May 2013 #66
Part of the issue is.... blackspade May 2013 #41
As pointed out to another posted who made that same point SpartanDem May 2013 #42
That happens all the time. blackspade May 2013 #43
The judicial results doesn't mean overall legal reasoning is progressive SpartanDem May 2013 #52
I believe I pointed that out. blackspade May 2013 #54
If you don't want abortions & you don't want unwanted pregnancies, this pill is the best thing going judesedit May 2013 #28
Supposed you are the Pharmacist with a 15 year old female comes in accompanied by a 24601 May 2013 #63
Why? Why? Why? Myrina May 2013 #29
The President has ID'd himself as a Republican Doctor_J May 2013 #37
LBJ was more liberal than Bernie Sanders and the protesters took LBJ down graham4anything May 2013 #48
History fail. blackspade May 2013 #55
LBJ had 1000s of achievements. While others dreamed, LBJ did. I love LBJ! graham4anything May 2013 #57
Again, your understanding of history blackspade May 2013 #58
you just agreed with me. Looking back, tis easy to see and make sure NEVER AGAIN graham4anything May 2013 #59
We are definately not in agreement on the facts. blackspade May 2013 #60
More Justice Department stupidity. blackspade May 2013 #35
Unbelievable Doctor_J May 2013 #36
You have got to be kidding. n/t Laelth May 2013 #46
*facepalm* sakabatou May 2013 #53
Question: Why is it available only to women? Can't men buy it? Pterodactyl May 2013 #56
My understanding is that men can buy it, although some pharmacists have refused to sell it. n/t winter is coming May 2013 #65
That's just terrible! Pterodactyl May 2013 #69
Some pharmacists have claimed they are concerned men who buy it may be a pimp or rapist davidn3600 May 2013 #70
Do they feel 15 is not young enough? marshall May 2013 #61
I've never seen or heard any indication that there's an age restriction for Tylenol. winter is coming May 2013 #64
WTF!!! grahamhgreen May 2013 #62
geez, let women choose Plan B if Plan A didn't work - what is with this DOJ!? wordpix May 2013 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Department to app...»Reply #30