Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,727 posts)
6. Nope.
Tue Apr 9, 2013, 11:45 AM
Apr 2013

There is some evidence that there may have been a tiny radiation release prior to the tsunami arriving... and there are unsubstantiated claims that some anonymous worker saw a cracked pipe (that he couldn't identify).

That's a long way from saying that the plant was on it's way to melting down even if the tsunami hadn't arrived. He was in the turbine room, and the pipes that he could have seen there wouldn't have anything to do with emergency cooling. He also makes some comments that make clear that (if he exists at all) he doesn't know what he's talking about:

I also saw that part of the wall of the turbine building for reactor one had come away. That crack might have affected the reactor.


Well... no. The wall of the turbine building is entirely unrelated to the walls of the reactors themselves. It's almost as silly as the hyperventilating that went on when a crack was found within the North Anna containment! (GASP!!!)... which of course turned out to be nothing at all.

Maybe local geological factors made the quake worse. (See nearby Sendai Dam failure)

I'm not just guessing that closer must meen larger... I'm talking about the actual readings at the reactors themselves. Fukushima simply didn't exceed the design basis except in one axis by the tiniest amount.
Makes sense. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #1
Sorry... no. FBaggins Apr 2013 #4
But this one DID fail. And it failed BEFORE the Tsunami. AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #5
Nope. FBaggins Apr 2013 #6
*These* reactors? . . . Journeyman Apr 2013 #2
Corporations are people, my friend. lexw Apr 2013 #3
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Leak Found at Fukushi...»Reply #6