Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Homerj1

(45 posts)
46. When did I say that rights didn't
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 12:16 AM
Mar 2013

exist in the constitution? The 3/5ths rule was most definitely a north thing, they didn't want the south to use them for house apportionment

You could have made a tiny mistake, the BOR and the Constitution doesn't grant us rights. They more or less tell what the govt can't do. No piece of paper grants you rights.

Aw, big bad NRA cowards, afraid of a few women TheCowsCameHome Mar 2013 #1
You could have said sangsaran Mar 2013 #6
I could have, TheCowsCameHome Mar 2013 #29
Really? Linking to the Dailycaller? maxsolomon Mar 2013 #2
Local TV coverage Omaha Steve Mar 2013 #4
Yes Whoopdedoo Mar 2013 #5
Their blog post is here: coffeenap Mar 2013 #3
Why should they meet with them... ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #13
It was a plubcity stunt Homerj1 Mar 2013 #14
Indeed, nothing but one ProgressiveProfessor Mar 2013 #15
I see the start of a Mothers against drunk driving like group classykaren Mar 2013 #20
You confuse a right (2nd amendment) Homerj1 Mar 2013 #22
Just because it's a right doesn't mean it's not a crime. Aristus Mar 2013 #23
where in the BOR was Homerj1 Mar 2013 #24
It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's in the U.S. Constitution. Article I, Section 2, Paragraph 3. Aristus Mar 2013 #26
I asked for the BOR not the Constitution Homerj1 Mar 2013 #32
bye bye Progressive dog Mar 2013 #44
When did I say that rights didn't Homerj1 Mar 2013 #46
my god, you don't even read what you write Progressive dog Mar 2013 #55
Hell yes it is about control etherealtruth Mar 2013 #27
Then you are against Homerj1 Mar 2013 #28
Welcome to DU etherealtruth Mar 2013 #30
Do you have a problem with that? Homerj1 Mar 2013 #33
It certainly is an odd thing to desire to post on a liberal website solely promoting gun ownership etherealtruth Mar 2013 #34
Can you do me a favor? Homerj1 Mar 2013 #36
I do put certain rights above others etherealtruth Mar 2013 #38
They had the FIRST (and at that time only) story in goggle news Omaha Steve Mar 2013 #45
I am not sure what your response is in reference to? etherealtruth Mar 2013 #48
Sorry, I replied in the wrong place when I was in a hurry Omaha Steve Mar 2013 #57
Your new friend here signed up 5 years ago and just now started posting Son of Gob Mar 2013 #39
Yeah etherealtruth Mar 2013 #40
We got trolls and we got moles...eom Kolesar Mar 2013 #51
Shockingly, he turned out to be a sock puppet. Son of Gob Mar 2013 #58
You confuse with legality with morality etherealtruth Mar 2013 #25
So it was a publicity stunt..What's wrong with that? red dog 1 Mar 2013 #21
Sounds like a pretty smart thing to me etherealtruth Mar 2013 #35
not all attention Homerj1 Mar 2013 #37
Not all attention is good attention? red dog 1 Mar 2013 #42
Nor may wisdom be found in bumper-stickers sentiments LanternWaste Mar 2013 #54
I agree with you 100 percent. red dog 1 Mar 2013 #41
Democracy in action! Phlem Mar 2013 #7
More of this, please. We will not forget, proprietors of domestic terrorism. nt onehandle Mar 2013 #8
Why is "moms" in quotes? Is the RW Daily Caller saying they're not moms? baldguy Mar 2013 #9
The latter. sangsaran Mar 2013 #11
So, they hate the FIRST Amendment? blm Mar 2013 #10
Does the FIRST Amendment cover a person's right to protest hughee99 Mar 2013 #19
Probably not - see abortion clinics and protesting The Straight Story Mar 2013 #31
Does the NRA have a history of receiving threats? daleanime Mar 2013 #53
Fuck the NRA mwrguy Mar 2013 #12
Odd MindPilot Mar 2013 #16
These Moms rock! Bjorn Against Mar 2013 #17
Thanks to Omaha Steve for posting this. red dog 1 Mar 2013 #18
fascism... the gun industry's lobbying group has more rights than ordinary tax payers fascisthunter Mar 2013 #43
Maybe you missed the part where they came onto private property? premium Mar 2013 #47
First read it as "anti gun noms." Latella moment. Blandocyte Mar 2013 #49
They should count themselves lucky that they didn't get shot primavera Mar 2013 #50
Step in the lions den, SayWut Mar 2013 #52
And the implication of support for a right-wing political action committee... LanternWaste Mar 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Anti-gun concerned ‘moms’...»Reply #46