Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal Over Corporate Campaign Contributions [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)44. They do if the SCOTUS says they do. nm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal Over Corporate Campaign Contributions [View all]
Purveyor
Feb 2013
OP
As an individual I also am more limited in how far and wide I can spread my message compared
onenote
Feb 2013
#54
I just explained that regulation of speech is and always has been permissible if justified by a
onenote
Feb 2013
#21
Corporations have privileges that are and should be defined by federal and state laws.
NYC Liberal
Feb 2013
#57
Corporations aren't people - they're giant profit-obsessed monsters pretending to be people.
reformist2
Feb 2013
#5
They are legal entities, existing only paper and they exist for the sole purpose
ProfessionalLeftist
Feb 2013
#25