Latest Breaking News

Drale

(7,932 posts)

11. Because the court ruled Illinois ban on concealed carry unconstitutional

Sat Feb 23, 2013, 06:41 PM

Feb 2013

but it now this ruling says otherwise how can it be both constitutional and unconstitutional, when they are both working off the same Constitution.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal court says concealed gun permits not protected by 2nd Amendment [View all] struggle4progress Feb 2013 OP

Does this throw out the judges ruling that Drale Feb 2013 #1

Obviously not. Why would you think that? AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #8

Because the court ruled Illinois ban on concealed carry unconstitutional Drale Feb 2013 #11

The Court for the 10th Cir did not rule that the "Illinois ban on concealed carry" is constitutional AnotherMcIntosh Feb 2013 #13

The constitution is not an unabigiuos document... reACTIONary Feb 2013 #16

Spel chek iz yur frend. JimDandy Feb 2013 #23

i nedz awl teh freindz i kan git (nt) reACTIONary Feb 2013 #37

LOL n/t JimDandy Feb 2013 #38

different circuit bossy22 Feb 2013 #27

Great start! Proves with a great court, the NRA can forever be defeated permanently graham4anything Feb 2013 #2

Th opposite conclusion has been reached by other circuits ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #18

yep. headed that way. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2013 #21

And one day there will be shortly a good SCOTUS graham4anything Feb 2013 #22

More 1%er adoration... ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #28

The 1% is the NRA. 4million out of 350 million is 1.45 rounded down to 1 graham4anything Feb 2013 #29

Your same "hero" Mike Bloomberg who just vetoed an anti-discrimination bill... LAGC Feb 2013 #30

The Great Equalizer got another pro-NRA candidate to quit this week graham4anything Feb 2013 #31

So anything else he does, no matter how 1% is OK because he is against guns ProgressiveProfessor Feb 2013 #33

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #34

Yup. And Scalia, Thomas and Kennedy will all retire in the near future graham4anything Feb 2013 #35

o more and no less than those on DU who support the right-wing PAC known as the NRA... LanternWaste Feb 2013 #39

What part does the 10th Circuit not get about the right to conceal and bear arms? indepat Feb 2013 #3

10th Circuit Court of Appeals is in Denver. Hard Assets Feb 2013 #5

That is not a completely correct title. hack89 Feb 2013 #4

Did you read the article? SecularMotion Feb 2013 #6

OK - but U.S. Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has just ruled the opposite hack89 Feb 2013 #9

IIRC the issue in illinois was a bit different bossy22 Feb 2013 #26

Illinois was specifically told that a concealed carry ban was unconsitutional hack89 Feb 2013 #32

you would prefer openly carried arms? bubbayugga Feb 2013 #19

Filed under no shit. Warren Stupidity Feb 2013 #7

So open carry then. AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #10

Thanks Struggle.. Poor Colorado has had their Cha Feb 2013 #12

This decision echoes Scalia in Heller v. D.C. OldRedneck Feb 2013 #14

What Did Peterson Think "Well Regulated" In The 2nd Amendment Meant DallasNE Feb 2013 #15

Scalia explained all that in Heller primavera Feb 2013 #36

Chip, chip, chip away. onehandle Feb 2013 #17

As usual with legal decisions it is poorly reported. former9thward Feb 2013 #20

The court nowhere indicates that "Peterson would have won his case had he challenged struggle4progress Feb 2013 #24

We differ on the interpretation. former9thward Feb 2013 #25