Latest Breaking News

yardwork

(61,539 posts)

33. What? I really don't understand your comment.

Mon Jan 30, 2012, 04:12 PM

Jan 2012

The study is not based on women being asked their opinion of risk. The study analyzed data related to birth outcomes and complications. It isn't heartless to find out how many pregnancies caused complications for the mother. Nor it is heartless to determine how many abortions caused complications. Having that information can lead to better healthcare. How is that inhuman?

I am genuinely puzzled by your post.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Abortion safer than giving birth, study says [View all] yardwork Jan 2012 OP

Surprising that it was published on Fox's site! MarkCharles Jan 2012 #1

I was astounded that Fox published it. It's a Reuter's report, but still..... yardwork Jan 2012 #3

Do I have to register there to see them? I don't see how MarkCharles Jan 2012 #4

lordy may! I would never register with Fox. Look for the "comments" in tiny print, left-hand column. yardwork Jan 2012 #6

Sorry, my ad blocker or something is not allowing me to see any when.. MarkCharles Jan 2012 #8

Well, you're not really missing anything. Just the usual. yardwork Jan 2012 #11

The RW's solution to that is easy: take abortion back to dirty alleys! sinkingfeeling Jan 2012 #2

Why of course! Then all those annoying demanding women can die quickly! calimary Jan 2012 #7

... CountAllVotes Jan 2012 #5

As a woman who gave natural birth three times BlueCaliDem Jan 2012 #9

Be curious how this compares in vaginal birth vs cesarean birth.... Pachamama Jan 2012 #10

"elective cesareans"? JDPriestly Jan 2012 #14

There are two kinds of cesareans: 1) Emergency 2) Elective Pachamama Jan 2012 #18

Women should talk to other women who have had cesareans before "electing" to have them. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #19

I agree.... Pachamama Jan 2012 #20

My children are just wonderful and healthy. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #26

I had an 'elective' laundry_queen Jan 2012 #37

Beautifully said. People love to diss women who have cesareans. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #39

I was lucky not to have an "emergency" cesarean with my first. yardwork Jan 2012 #23

Elected Sgent Jan 2012 #32

My caesarean was NECESSARY to save my life, NOT "elective" or "emergency". Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2012 #38

Anyone who could read the CDC website already knew this LadyHawkAZ Jan 2012 #12

studies have been showing this since shortly after abortion was legalized azurnoir Jan 2012 #21

Utterly true. JDPriestly Jan 2012 #13

True, this is a well known fact for many years avaistheone1 Jan 2012 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author avaistheone1 Jan 2012 #16

From the "no shit" department... Taverner Jan 2012 #17

Having had a breech birth, ectopic, and an induction HockeyMom Jan 2012 #22

One of the reasons I posted this is because of the myth that abortion causes breast cancer. yardwork Jan 2012 #24

They must have mistaken it for RU-486 Nikia Jan 2012 #27

Yes, RU-486 causes an abortion, so it can cause complications. yardwork Jan 2012 #28

And this is the basis of Roe V Wade Tumbulu Jan 2012 #25

I don't disagree with the sentiment iverglas Jan 2012 #35

well, I read Justice Blackmun's opinion differently Tumbulu Jan 2012 #40

just for info and the record iverglas Jan 2012 #41

Thanks for posting the summary, Tumbulu Jan 2012 #42

K & R dipsydoodle Jan 2012 #29

What a ridiculous, heartless, inhuman study. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #30

What? I really don't understand your comment. yardwork Jan 2012 #33

"The two risks cannot therefore be meaningfully compared." iverglas Jan 2012 #36

DR Found in Yonkers Jan 2012 #31

Where is the comment section for that article? nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #34