Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)

20. It varies from state to state n/t

Reply to lynne (Reply #19)

Wed Feb 6, 2013, 10:44 AM

Feb 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Colorado lawmakers want gun owners exposed to civil liability [View all] UnrepentantLiberal Feb 2013 OP

YES!!! I hope this passes and pushes the rest of the country... hlthe2b Feb 2013 #1

Agreed lsewpershad Feb 2013 #31

Require insurance coverage tooeyeten Feb 2013 #2

This would have the added effect of putting the insurance industry in the mix ashling Feb 2013 #9

definitely! mwooldri Feb 2013 #12

Nope. Require insurance coverage for each and every gun kestrel91316 Feb 2013 #22

Finally! This is what we need! JDPriestly Feb 2013 #3

It looks like somebody is not awawe of federal law Travis_0004 Feb 2013 #4

Abortion is also protected, but that doesn't stop states from imposing LeftInTX Feb 2013 #7

That needs to be challenged/changed at the Federal level, ashling Feb 2013 #10

Simple changed the Federal law 3...2...1 upaloopa Feb 2013 #26

You know a hundred or so Republicans that would vote for that? NickB79 Feb 2013 #30

The state needs to pass the laws in defiance of federal law. Gun laws are traditionally mountain grammy Feb 2013 #40

It is definitely coming. Average, everyday people are getting an education that we didn't want but libdem4life Feb 2013 #5

So well stated Tumbulu Feb 2013 #13

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/responsible smccarter Feb 2013 #6

Don't make the f...ing gun no problem. upaloopa Feb 2013 #27

Punitive and unnecessary and probably an unconstitutional status punishment. Deep13 Feb 2013 #8

Forget it Tumbulu Feb 2013 #11

You have the same answer to everything upaloopa Feb 2013 #28

You forgot the false analogy Lordquinton Feb 2013 #35

I'm sorry, but you're wrong... RiverNoord Feb 2013 #32

about time. robinlynne Feb 2013 #14

I have been saying ever since Sandy Hook that all gun owners should be required SheilaT Feb 2013 #15

+1,000,000 n/t cosmicone Feb 2013 #18

Guns are irresponsible. Lordquinton Feb 2013 #36

Wondering if lawmakers have discussed this with the insurance industry - lynne Feb 2013 #16

You are incorrect. cosmicone Feb 2013 #17

Sorry, but I AM correct - lynne Feb 2013 #19

It varies from state to state n/t cosmicone Feb 2013 #20

They need to be held CRIMINALLY liable if there is kestrel91316 Feb 2013 #21

yes, and no possible second amendment overlap samsingh Feb 2013 #23

The gun industry makes obscene profits, while socializing the public cost...$175 billion libdem4life Feb 2013 #24

Yes! Gun owners need to actually BE responsible. Maineman Feb 2013 #25

When a gun owner dies... Maineman Feb 2013 #29

I see the goal 1983law Feb 2013 #33

Sounds like a good plan. idwiyo Feb 2013 #34

Accountability.....+++++ marions ghost Feb 2013 #37

Exempting handguns makes no sense whatsoever hack89 Feb 2013 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Feb 2013 #39