Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socal31

(2,484 posts)
27. You aren't following it, so we can agree to disagree.
Thu Jan 31, 2013, 01:29 AM
Jan 2013

That was an appeal by the way, and it was very clear.

You sound like you just don't like personal firearm ownership in general. A sleepy person who shoots at an intruder could miss just as easily as someone who fits the legal definition of "drunk", and penetrate walls.

It seems like you are not following much of anything, because discharging a firearm in your home for self-defense is absolutely legal, even with the risk of it going through a wall.

Your understanding of firearms laws is lacking, and unfortunately that is what the NRA-fundies use against people who would like to advance sensible gun control.

I never stated you can do what you want in your home, like it is some foreign embassy. But you can do many things in your home that you cannot do in public. Police cannot come into my home to check if I am "intoxicated", and then if I am "intoxicated", search the home for a weapon. Never going to happen.

Pipe bombs are illegal, period. Thats not even apples and oranges, that's apples and barney the dinosaur.

Guns are legal in your home. Being "intoxicated" is legal in your home. Having your gun in your pocket when other people are in the home is legal. Threatening someone to use said gun on them is HIGHLY illegal, and that person will lose their gun rights for the rest of their life in most cases.

Having constructive or physical possession of a gun will never be illegal inside the home, as long as the gun is legal and you are legally allowed to own it.


Most emotional conversations about guns I see here are a waste of time. The threads degrade into name calling and accusations. The NRA probably LOVES that the issue splits the party base.

We should not be talking about innocuous stories like this, we need to be rallying around my Senator's bill. People in Nevada should be calling Harry and DEMANDING a vote. Letters, grass-roots, etc to get sensible legislation on the table before it is too late. Posting every story of a shooting is not going to pass a bill. Let's get every vote on record, and see who calls in sick that day.

Not sure why this would even be a question. Socal31 Jan 2013 #1
Sure. But if he used the weapon 'in an illegal manner', someone could be dead. randome Jan 2013 #2
I just don't see that standing up to any court challenge. Socal31 Jan 2013 #4
The article doesn't explain what the 'dispute' was. randome Jan 2013 #8
try growing MJ in your home and see if that still works out 0rganism Jan 2013 #14
Marijuana can be grown in the home where I am. Socal31 Jan 2013 #16
you're quite lucky to have that privelege 0rganism Jan 2013 #17
Would you Please Not Bring Irrelevant Arguments Into This. The Thread is not about MJ. dballance Jan 2013 #28
That is not how the law is applied outside the home. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #11
No exemption for the interior of private property? Socal31 Jan 2013 #12
except i didn't say any of that bullshit you just attributed to me. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #18
Being in possession of a firearm in your home while intoxicated is not a crime. Socal31 Jan 2013 #20
Does not follow. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #22
You aren't following it, so we can agree to disagree. Socal31 Jan 2013 #27
You don't know me at all. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #30
Wish they had ruled based on privacy rights Peregrine Jan 2013 #3
Me, too. FiveGoodMen Jan 2013 #6
Quote: (And then stay away from home till their livers had processed all the alcohol?) onpatrol98 Jan 2013 #23
Sounds kinky. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #5
correct ruling qazplm Jan 2013 #7
Whew! I'd get the electric chair!! Redford Jan 2013 #9
I'm drunk right now, and there's a car in my GARAGE!! OH NOES!!!!1!!! MNBrewer Jan 2013 #10
I think you will be OK, as long as you are not waving it around and threatening Thor_MN Jan 2013 #13
I tried... awoke_in_2003 Jan 2013 #21
I think you will be OK, as long as you are not waving it around and threatening onpatrol98 Jan 2013 #24
Does that apply to polish sausage too? snooper2 Jan 2013 #25
The gun was in his pocket, not merely in the house. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #19
That Information Wasn't in the Linked-to Article. Where'd you find it? /eom dballance Jan 2013 #29
Looks like three people called the cops actually. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #31
That's A Much Better Detailed Version of the Story dballance Jan 2013 #32
Yeah, the story has been spun like he was drunk inside his home, and they searched AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #33
I have no problem with this Gman Jan 2013 #15
This is a sensible ruling. Where on earth would anyone get the idea kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #26
Please read this account of what happened, and see if it changes your opinion. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #34
Family members should remove the guns from the house - lynne Jan 2013 #35
I'm about as anti-gun as they get... primavera Jan 2013 #37
It's absolutely illegal outside the home to handle a firearm while drunk. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #38
Actual Court Opinion happyslug Jan 2013 #36
Basically the Prosecution sucked. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #39
I have a problem with the decision, one sentence puts me off happyslug Jan 2013 #40
Yep. Same for me. AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»It's not illegal to be dr...»Reply #27