Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Behind the Aegis

(53,921 posts)
23. Perhaps we are getting somewhere; we shall see.
Wed Jan 30, 2013, 07:34 AM
Jan 2013

An analogy draws comparisons, but not always the sameness. Had I used Fred Phelps and a homophobic reference, then you would have been unable to draw the erroneous conclusion you did. And yes, you did miss the point. The last word "racist" was in reference to the analogy I provided.

I am not splitting hairs in regards to racism and bigotry; you are failing to understand the difference. Racism is always "bigotry." But, bigotry, is not always "racism." Being homophobic is bigoted, but it is not racist.

The foolishness and ignorance of your "analogy" is not based on my "picayune points of language" but rather, your not understanding the language being used. For your analogy to work, you would have to understand that International Holocaust Remembrance Day does NOT commemorate the remembrance of the massacre of Israelis because Israel didn't exist. It remembers the massacre of Jews, as well as others. If this cartoon had been published on May 14th, then it would be a statement against Israel and the Israeli prime minster. For your "analogy" to work, it would have to be a cartoon published on an "aryan holiday" (if one existed) not a German one.

As for being your ex-wife, that would be difficult on the account of my having a penis. But, I have to say, I can see her point and I haven't heard a word from her.

What the Fuck is ant-Semitic about the TRUTH? CBGLuthier Jan 2013 #1
Such a phony! procon Jan 2013 #5
I don't see it as anti Jewish notadmblnd Jan 2013 #2
Scarfe apologised for not knowing it was Holocaust day dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #3
Calling this cartoon "anti-semitic' is nonsensical and disingenuous onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #4
A couple things HERVEPA Jan 2013 #7
A curious couple ... onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #15
The "common" word being misunderstood is "anti-Semitic." Behind the Aegis Jan 2013 #16
Well, I learned something today! onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #18
The cartoon may not be anti-Semitic, but the timing is suspect. Behind the Aegis Jan 2013 #19
Now you've done it! onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #20
No, you have done it. Missed the point! Behind the Aegis Jan 2013 #21
Now we're getting somewhere! onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #22
Perhaps we are getting somewhere; we shall see. Behind the Aegis Jan 2013 #23
Yes, yes, ... onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #24
It is the blood that makes it antisemitic. OldEurope Jan 2013 #6
He isn't drinking it. This isn't even remotely "blood libel." eom leveymg Jan 2013 #10
The blood here is not about the "Blood Libel", its about the killing of Palestinians. Arabs ..... marble falls Jan 2013 #8
Grotesque, yes. But, anti-Netanyahu & anti-Occupation Wall is not anti-semitic. leveymg Jan 2013 #9
Obama ... GeorgeGist Jan 2013 #11
If the art style has a familiar look to you ... brett_jv Jan 2013 #12
Thanks for the Pink Floyd Wall connection onwardsand upwards Jan 2013 #17
The toon is grotesque but is only anti apartheid. DavidWD72 Jan 2013 #13
I wonder how he feels about all those cartoons with Middle Easterners strapped with bombs? Ash_F Jan 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rupert Murdoch apologises...»Reply #23