Latest Breaking News

Beacool

(30,247 posts)

10. This super PAC is not associated with Hillary.

Tue Jan 29, 2013, 02:00 PM

Jan 2013

As Black explained herself, they are doing this on their own. They are not part of "Hillaryland". Although, I see nothing wrong with it. Supporters of other potential candidates can do the same if they choose.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton super PAC launched [View all] Special Agent Oso Jan 2013 OP

I have only one thing to say about this. MynameisBlarney Jan 2013 #1

Oh...I'm in! Purveyor Jan 2013 #5

I'm Ready!!! nt msanthrope Jan 2013 #2

It will be interesting to watch the Pukes desperately trying to... Walk away Jan 2013 #3

I bet heads are asplodin MynameisBlarney Jan 2013 #4

Goooooooooooood ............! nt MADem Jan 2013 #6

OFFS progressoid Jan 2013 #7

Not to mention, I'm not a fan of annointing the next leader without a primary. MessiahRp Jan 2013 #8

+ 100 nt antigop Jan 2013 #34

This super PAC is not associated with Hillary. Beacool Jan 2013 #10

Anyone donating money should understand that it's likely wasted. randome Jan 2013 #35

No, they are not. Beacool Jan 2013 #36

Sounds like bunk to me. She is already running and I'm donating. nt Walk away Apr 2013 #60

Thank you iandhr Jan 2013 #12

This is appropriately about 2014...one calendar year away. We blew 2010..straight up and have TP to libdem4life Jan 2013 #15

Fantastic!!! Beacool Jan 2013 #9

Chelsea better get busy if she wants Mom home with the baby. Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #17

I just finished listening to her "townterview". Beacool Jan 2013 #21

I'm so proud of that women. As you say...she's already done so much around the world to help women. Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #27

Ode to Non coordination iandhr Jan 2013 #11

HA! Thank you for posting that...beat me to it. And how many people are going to contribute??? nt antigop Jan 2013 #23

anyone who's thinking of donating needs to watch that video. nt antigop Jan 2013 #44

But isn't Hillary an even BIGGER corporatist than Obama? rocktivity Jan 2013 #13

Perhaps, but the facts are they are all owned. Nixon: Yes he's an SOB but he's my SOB. libdem4life Jan 2013 #16

Be happy! Take what you get. Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #18

It just about broke my heart in 2008 when she didn't get the nomination. Beacool Jan 2013 #22

It broke mine too. After winning all those big states...I had high hopes.... Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #49

Yeah, they took it a little too far. Beacool Jan 2013 #51

yes, we need a progressive, not a corporate DLC Dem nt antigop Jan 2013 #20

OK, who is the candidate you think can win? nobodyspecial Jan 2013 #26

Yes, there will be a primary, not a coronation, as I have said repeatedly. nt antigop Jan 2013 #28

And, who is your candidate? nobodyspecial Jan 2013 #29

There is no "candidate" -- no one has announced. Geesh! nt antigop Jan 2013 #31

But you can't think of anyone who can beat her? Come on...you must have someone in mind. Walk away Apr 2013 #61

just another attempt at the "inevitability" meme. Add "1" to the inevitability meme counter. nt antigop Apr 2013 #63

It's pretty inevitable if someone who really doesn't support her can't come up with... Walk away Apr 2013 #64

No one has announced. That's a FACT. nt antigop Apr 2013 #65

Hillary and Julian..Clinton/Castro 2016. Make them learn how to correctly pronounce Hispanic names libdem4life Jan 2013 #14

"she cashed in her retirement savings" -- oh, good grief! antigop Jan 2013 #19

The really unfortunate thing about a Hillary SheilaT Jan 2013 #24

yes, we need someone new. nt antigop Jan 2013 #25

Go for it nobodyspecial Jan 2013 #30

Yes, we will have a primary, not a coronation, as I have said repeatedly. nt antigop Jan 2013 #32

That's your opinion, and Lord knows that you repeat it ad nauseam. Beacool Jan 2013 #38

Yes, we do indeed need someone new! Especially someone who will support American workers! nt antigop Jan 2013 #39

Same mantra with you. Beacool Jan 2013 #42

Yes, indeed, we need someone who will support American workers! nt antigop Jan 2013 #43

New is always inherently better... LanternWaste Jan 2013 #55

new..as in PRO-LABOR -- not a corporate Dem. nt antigop Jan 2013 #56

Yes. Pro-labor in the largest and smallest sense of the word. nt amandabeech Jan 2013 #57

Well, in 2008 it was commonly perceived that SheilaT Jan 2013 #45

Planning to run Obama again? Beacool Jan 2013 #46

Well, a lot of people here are saying that Hillary's nomination is SheilaT Jan 2013 #53

Woman's prerogative to change her mind. Beacool Jan 2013 #54

+1000 n/t OhioChick Jan 2013 #33

Yes, it is. Obama has raised the bar on what's acceptable now. randome Jan 2013 #48

Depends on what new ideas they have. We have castro from Texas. Auntie Bush Jan 2013 #50

You mean like losing the Presidency to Chris Christie? That would be new. nt Walk away Apr 2013 #62

So much for getting the money out of politics. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2013 #37

We knew it was coming. Silentnomore Jan 2013 #40

Hillary!?! windowpilot Jan 2013 #41

Good god. Have we learned NOTHING? woo me with science Jan 2013 #47

Thanks, woo. No, some people still haven't learned. nt antigop Jan 2013 #52

"The last thing we need is another corporate lackey and warmonger." Nihil Jan 2013 #59

K and R Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #58