Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
10. I agree. As the rate of defections has declined and fewer civilians join, the supply of fighters
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jan 2013

shifts. Assad's military has proven to be very strong, even with some defections early on, which is no surprise. That was always Assad's ace in the hole. How do you get rid of a dictator who has one of the strongest militaries around and is not afraid to use it.

It is very unfortunate that the violence has gone on for so long and with the predictable result that the more violent wings of the opposition become more and more dominant. If there could have been a resolution early on the dynamic would have been much different.

I had not observed a France-led move to involve NATO. If the US does not participate (I agree that it is doubtful that it will) that idea will go nowhere.

Assad is not home free yet, but I agree that is looking more and more likely that he will survive with his powers intact. I suppose that counts as a victory for him if not for the majority of the Syrian people. One has to give him credit for opposing any negotiated opening of the regime that many thought was possible in 2011. The path he has chosen has been brutal for Syria but may turn out to be quite good for him.

oh come on, it's long been clear that a major part of the rebels are "islamists" NoMoreWarNow Jan 2013 #1
Juan Cole: Islamists are 'very minor in the revolution a a whole, representing a small percentage .. pampango Jan 2013 #4
Foreign Jihadis are acknowledged to be the "most effective" part of the Syrian armed opposition. leveymg Jan 2013 #6
"Most effective", "highly effective" - certainly true. The only Syrians who are 'effective' fighters pampango Jan 2013 #8
Foreign fighter influx rose sharply in early summer when Army defections slowed to a trickle. leveymg Jan 2013 #9
I agree. As the rate of defections has declined and fewer civilians join, the supply of fighters pampango Jan 2013 #10
The winners of the religious civil war in Syria are 1) al-Qaeda, 2) Israel, 3) KSA leveymg Jan 2013 #11
An al-Qaeda 'safe haven' in Syria will also put them adjacent to Israel which has to cause some pampango Jan 2013 #14
We know who the "winners" are, as well the victims are clearly the Syrian people, leveymg Jan 2013 #15
What bizarre babble is this? nt bemildred Jan 2013 #2
Islamicists wouldn't be a problem in Syria if France (and the US) hadn't "helped" there and in Libya leveymg Jan 2013 #3
More on the Gulf/western governments propaganda machine that shapes public opinion on Syria leveymg Jan 2013 #5
Hah. You're funny, France. Reap what you sow. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #7
I keep thinking: should France have gone into battle? UnrepentantLiberal Jan 2013 #13
France has nukes, right? tabasco Jan 2013 #12
Maybe zellie Jan 2013 #16
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»France fears Islamist ris...»Reply #10