Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell Reach Filibuster Reform Deal [View all]NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)31. Another possible OP title: "Democrats give voters the middle finger"
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/30/filibuster-reform-poll_n_2218963.html
A majority of Americans are in favor of requiring senators who wish to filibuster a bill to actually stand up on the Senate floor and talk, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll.
The survey finds that 65 percent of Americans believe senators should have to "participate in debate for the entire filibuster," a proposal that has gained ground in recent weeks as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Barack Obama have thrown their support behind reform efforts. Only 9 percent of those polled said that senators should be able to filibuster without being physically present, and another 26 percent said they were unsure.
A majority of Americans are in favor of requiring senators who wish to filibuster a bill to actually stand up on the Senate floor and talk, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll.
The survey finds that 65 percent of Americans believe senators should have to "participate in debate for the entire filibuster," a proposal that has gained ground in recent weeks as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and President Barack Obama have thrown their support behind reform efforts. Only 9 percent of those polled said that senators should be able to filibuster without being physically present, and another 26 percent said they were unsure.
Apparently a "majority of Americans" equates to squat.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
92 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I said that right after the election to anyone that would listen. Damn few would. Pelosi isn't
Purveyor
Jan 2013
#10
I disagree. Nancy presided over the most productive House in U.S. history. What she got passed was
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2013
#65
And Feinstein was listed as one of the seven not on board with talking fillibuster...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#22
Feinstein is notorious for proposing bills that sound Liberal...but, then go down.
KoKo
Jan 2013
#54
I'm shocked...shocked I tell you that Harry folded like a Dollar General lawnchair. Suckers!!! eom
Purveyor
Jan 2013
#3
"Progressive senators working to dramatically alter Senate rules were defeated on Thursday"
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#4
Yep, Reid just wants the ILLUSION that he wants real reform to have the Senate WORK again!
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#28
What do you base that on? They didn't change the rules when they had the majority.
24601
Jan 2013
#74
They threatened to get rid of it completely until we folded like a lawn chair.
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#80
Reid made the same threat - just words. It's unlikely that a majority of the Senators would give
24601
Jan 2013
#87
Note that the article indicates that Reid was apparently upset the names of the 6 were released.
PoliticAverse
Jan 2013
#17
Huffington Post article had already "leaked" these names, though some of them don't match up...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#29
Isn't our party's acting spectacular? I wonder what progressive measures
woo me with science
Jan 2013
#25
I understand your frustration and I share it. But the part of your comment that I take exception
totodeinhere
Jan 2013
#39
Wow, you type faster and far more succinctly than I, but I tried to say much the same!
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#49
I have enough knowledge of party history to know that while there were strong progressive elements
totodeinhere
Jan 2013
#69
AFAICT, they're operating under the belief that Republicans won't take away the filibuster
jeff47
Jan 2013
#85
I could just easily scream BOOOOOOOO!!!! but would rather recommend taking action
alp227
Jan 2013
#43
One opportunity, have you been in a cave the last 4 years? they did it nearly EVERY
Dragonfli
Jan 2013
#60
If Dems were a minority, I'd PREFER a talking filibuster, as Bernie Sanders HAS and WOULD!!!
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#63
I wonder what would have happened if Sharon Angle had beaten him earlier...
cascadiance
Jan 2013
#64
After thinking about this more, the Democrats will likely be in the minority in 2014.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jan 2013
#75