Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Panetta opens combat roles to women [View all]actslikeacarrot
(464 posts)22. I think the next step..
...is they are going to standardize the PT requirements across the board. Dont pass, get admin sepp'ed out after a certain amount of time to allow someone to get in regs again.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I thought this had been settled a couple months ago? Oh well, good on him (and Obama).
TwilightGardener
Jan 2013
#3
The distinction between "combat" and "non-combat" has been somewhat quaint for awhile
Recursion
Jan 2013
#7
When they send purchasing agents on a mission to rescue hostages or take a forward enemy
jtuck004
Jan 2013
#28
Your concern is noted. Please feel free to share more of your concerns, and enjoy your stay. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#24
Bless your heart. I have accused you of nothing. I truly wish you would air more of your concerns,
msanthrope
Jan 2013
#26
Cool. Now all we need is a draft with no deferrments, and war will be finished. n/t
jtuck004
Jan 2013
#29
I want our ERA amendment - this was one of their biggest fear mongering - we need equal rights
2Design
Jan 2013
#30
Well then it is time that all women, once they turn 18 years of age, register for the Selective
Purveyor
Jan 2013
#37
I wonder about the emotional impact on guys when a woman gets shredded.
DollarBillHines
Jan 2013
#38