Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(12,272 posts)

14. Sorry, didn't know

Mon Jan 21, 2013, 05:41 PM

Jan 2013

But, of course, yours is still an effective story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thousands of chemicals pose risks to health [View all] proverbialwisdom Jan 2013 OP

If you'd like to change your own exposure... hedgehog Jan 2013 #1

I love that website! onestepforward Jan 2013 #3

The flipside is that the flame retardant on our couch... derby378 Jan 2013 #2

Wow, definitely makes one have to weigh the pros and cons siligut Jan 2013 #8

I appreciate the sentiment, but... derby378 Jan 2013 #10

Sorry, didn't know siligut Jan 2013 #14

No problem at all derby378 Jan 2013 #15

I'm afraid you're right derby378 Jan 2013 #16

We already have them. JoeyT Jan 2013 #24

So we're all stuck with the fire retardants in our couches pnwmom Jan 2013 #25

Bookmarked for future reference. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #4

K&R DeSwiss Jan 2013 #5

De nada. DeSwiss Jan 2013 #23

K&R They_Live Jan 2013 #6

It's alarming -- and overwhelming. Thanks for this. gateley Jan 2013 #7

When we voiced concern about this in the 80s we were written off siligut Jan 2013 #9

The Hundred year old lie - Better living through chemistry angrycaveman Jan 2013 #12

Did they also push for fire retardants in infant and toddler PJs? Igel Jan 2013 #19

I know they pushed for fire retardants in furniture. pnwmom Jan 2013 #20