Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Selatius

(20,441 posts)
8. It seems Washington and London were unhappy with Algeria's ham-fisted and unilateral violent action.
Sat Jan 19, 2013, 06:21 AM
Jan 2013

They were likely hoping the hostage situation would be resolved without the scenario of Algerian Army and Air Force units bombing the location where the hostages were and then sending troops to overrun the location guns blazing.

On the other hand, if Algeria's military forces can reach into Mali like that and do damage to these religious fundamentalists and Tuareg nationalists, the other question on Washington's mind is what happens to all the gold and uranium resources that Mali has that Algeria could incidentally be in a position to capture. If Algeria decided to go it alone and occupy northern Mali to destroy the hideouts, they would become de facto controllers of these rich mineral resources whether Washington wants it or not.

Algeria has been fighting one of the parties (AQIM, as it is now called) for years Alamuti Lotus Jan 2013 #1
Do we know who actually has the most leverage in North Africa? SleeplessinSoCal Jan 2013 #2
Though I admire Kerry immensely, one thing that the US needs to realize is that karynnj Jan 2013 #17
There are many cultural differences marshall Jan 2013 #19
Say. Algeria has OIL. And Mali has uranium, Gold, Petroleum, Strategic Minerals... Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #3
So there were over 700 hostages, and the Algerian army rescued about 670 of them bhikkhu Jan 2013 #4
It would seem from analysis and reports here in the UK dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #5
It seems Washington and London were unhappy with Algeria's ham-fisted and unilateral violent action. Selatius Jan 2013 #8
Occupy northern Mali ? dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #10
Again, "ham-fisted and unilateral violence" seems to be reserved for certain parties bhikkhu Jan 2013 #12
Algeria siege: Hostage nations concerned over situation dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #6
Algerian hostage crisis: last group of jihadists hold out in gas plant dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #7
Algeria - another one of the half-dozen countries Mr.Bill Jan 2013 #9
The Algerian military has been locked in a bloody civil war w/Islamicists since Gulf War One ended. leveymg Jan 2013 #11
US strategy for region ? dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #13
We don't really seem to have had one, except don't get in the way of the Saudis or the Israelis. leveymg Jan 2013 #14
I was actually querying dipsydoodle Jan 2013 #16
So? OldRedneck Jan 2013 #15
Basically, that's the way terrorists see things too daleo Jan 2013 #18
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Algerian Stance Spoils U....»Reply #8