Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
22. There isn't one Democrat who could get as many votes in the Senate and the House to get something
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:09 PM
Jan 2013

passed.


All of the people on the left who want to see a reduced military budget know that Hagel is the sharpest knife in the drawer, and that includes normal Obama bashers like Glenn Greenwald. You are hung up on a letter next to the name rather than the center objective of making the most significant structural change in government budgets since the cold war. It is going to take somebody with not only bipartisan credentials but also impecable defense credentials to get Senators to agree to cut exotic weapons that cost billions but guarantee millions in campaign contributions and to close half of the bases in the US, which even the military no longer wants. The fact that he was an enlisted man gives him the most credentials to talk about gold plating the military and ignoring the common soldier.

It is a BFD its just that you want to focus on trivialities.

There is a significant wing of the Republican Party who agrees with Eisenhower about the military/industrial complex but need someone to give them cover so that they don't appear to be following Ron Paul. If you want to cut defense then you have to make it a bipartisan effort. If you want to maintain the status quo then pick any Democrat you want.

What Democratic critics have there been, really? This is all an attempt TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #1
I am. Pab Sungenis Jan 2013 #29
A threat to the The Wizard Jan 2013 #2
"A slap in the face to Bibi Netanyahu!" Larrymoe Curlyshemp Jan 2013 #3
Bibi deserves a Sekhmets Daughter Jan 2013 #28
The only critics are repukes still_one Jan 2013 #4
Not enough Democrats support this nomination KeepinItReal4u Jan 2013 #5
'yet'. n/t PoliticAverse Jan 2013 #6
Oh, there will be. Senate Dems aren't going to weaken our President TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #7
Senators all face re-election at some point unless they retire or are kicked out. amandabeech Jan 2013 #8
I seriously doubt that they will hear from Dem constituents on this. TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #15
I think that there are a few who will hear from a select group of Dem constituents, amandabeech Jan 2013 #17
If you are referring to Jews, on Israel, the majority of US Jews agree with J Street karynnj Jan 2013 #21
I was thinking about Jewish Americans who might be concerned about Israel. amandabeech Jan 2013 #24
Thank you karynnj Jan 2013 #25
Republicans = Nattering Nabobs of NegaTEAvity Berlum Jan 2013 #9
I still think a Democrat will be a better pick leftynyc Jan 2013 #10
There's a good article on this by Glenn Greenwald muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #11
I'm not a fan of Greenwald leftynyc Jan 2013 #12
But Greenwald points out this is more about the withdrawal from Afghanistan muriel_volestrangler Jan 2013 #14
NOw he's looking for a fancy job leftynyc Jan 2013 #16
But you have quoted nothing about his reducing the defense budget. grantcart Jan 2013 #18
BFD leftynyc Jan 2013 #19
There isn't one Democrat who could get as many votes in the Senate and the House to get something grantcart Jan 2013 #22
Trivialities? leftynyc Jan 2013 #23
leftynyc JustAnotherGen Jan 2013 #27
+1 ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #30
When it comes to the Defense Department the Secretary of Defense has only one grantcart Jan 2013 #31
Thanks grantcart JustAnotherGen Jan 2013 #26
For some people, cabinet positions are mostly an opportunity to showcase and TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #20
I think Graham is doing Hagel and the admin a favor.. naaman fletcher Jan 2013 #13
Clever point grantcart Jan 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Critics slam Chuck Hagel'...»Reply #22