Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Well that explains why I've been fired, like, 20 times jberryhill Dec 2012 #1
DUzy, for sure! Bozita Dec 2012 #38
You too sexy for your briefs (n/t) William Seger Dec 2012 #41
I get favorable rulings on my motions! jberryhill Dec 2012 #47
Bravo cntrfthrs Dec 2012 #52
Okay...Let's see how it goes when a woman fires the first MAN for being "irresistible". n/t whathehell Dec 2012 #2
Agreed. dballance Dec 2012 #53
We had a guy ask that a new woman be fired because his wife didn't want them travelling together Sen. Walter Sobchak Dec 2012 #3
so their pastor said it was okay to fire this stellar employee, eh? way to go, rev, you sexist jerk niyad Dec 2012 #4
The Knights consulted with their pastor, who agreed that terminating Nelson was appropriate. Kolesar Dec 2012 #13
The Christian Version of Shariah Law Eric the Reddish Dec 2012 #25
Can workers sue "irresistable" bosses Coyotl Dec 2012 #5
Sounds like a viable way to get out of an employment contract now. JimDandy Dec 2012 #17
Better to marry than burn--St. Paul, Corinthians Demeter Dec 2012 #60
if it wasn't already, that'll be an awkward office to work in bloomington-lib Dec 2012 #6
To the rest of the employees: You are resistible. progressoid Dec 2012 #11
I know right! Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #48
you know. it is not like i really NEED to be married. he could just go his own way. nt seabeyond Dec 2012 #66
Is Iowa a "Right-to-Work" state? TheDebbieDee Dec 2012 #7
THANK YOU. nt raccoon Dec 2012 #57
That's "employment at will" not "right to work" Jim Lane Dec 2012 #72
It's the same rationale for the bhurka, isn't it? evlbstrd Dec 2012 #8
Exactly. Sekhmets Daughter Dec 2012 #20
Well, alrighty then. n/t BlueToTheBone Dec 2012 #9
hmmmm PatrynXX Dec 2012 #10
So the dentist would have been equally likely to find a man attractive? spooky3 Dec 2012 #12
So the dentist is saying, "I am so very weak, that I wouldnt be able to control myself." rhett o rick Dec 2012 #14
actual Opinion happyslug Dec 2012 #15
Alright. Two things. R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #22
I agree. It is sexual harassment, and why weren't women on that jury? wordpix Dec 2012 #35
Sickening. R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #40
I never imagined the details would make the decison even MORE offensive Blasphemer Dec 2012 #51
Well I got it now Scairp Dec 2012 #29
Looks like sexual harassment. Ash_F Dec 2012 #34
if I were her I would appeal and sue the pants off this male harasser wordpix Dec 2012 #36
A few opitions, but mostly she is done happyslug Dec 2012 #45
Yep. And you know sexual harrassment is always the fault of the victim. tanyev Dec 2012 #61
Looks like he hired her and the wife Kingofalldems Dec 2012 #16
After working for the Dentist for ten years AND exchanging texts messages happyslug Dec 2012 #19
So help me here.... Red Mountain Dec 2012 #18
Are you F@CKIN kidding? R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #21
This Is Why People Form Unions: Stopping Discrimination and Arbitrary Firing Yavin4 Dec 2012 #23
I couldn't agree with you more. R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #24
Simply, Irresistible... Xipe Totec Dec 2012 #26
my old dentist's wife KT2000 Dec 2012 #27
Why can't the dentist just medicate himself with saltpeter on days when the woman is there? yellowcanine Dec 2012 #28
I suspect this is headed to Federal Court. yellowcanine Dec 2012 #30
not to mention that ISC is nothing but men! Not a jury of her peers wordpix Dec 2012 #37
Beware of the succubus! TexasTowelie Dec 2012 #31
Ah, so WHY was she hired in the 1st place? Must have been BEFORE the WIFE saw her! benld74 Dec 2012 #32
The woman and the wife worked together for 10 years happyslug Dec 2012 #50
U are correct hs, I missed the post benld74 Dec 2012 #65
So, this woman should loose everything because a rich dentist has no self control? Ash_F Dec 2012 #33
This case is hauntingly familliar of cases in India where R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #42
How about an "irressistable attraction" defense for, say. rapists???? marble falls Dec 2012 #39
Yeah. I guess there was a bong party in the ISC chambers or something to that level. R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #44
So much for the party of personal responsibility. I read today about some of his comments over ..... marble falls Dec 2012 #62
I don't particularly have a problem with terminating her cosmicone Dec 2012 #43
"I don't particularly have a problem with terminating her." R. Daneel Olivaw Dec 2012 #46
Sure cosmicone Dec 2012 #55
This really doesn't have much to do with right-to-work states... Xithras Dec 2012 #71
So the court said that gender has no basis in attraction legitimacy? Fearless Dec 2012 #49
I'm just curious if the wife chose the patients, so they didn't interfere with their marriage? Frustratedlady Dec 2012 #54
I thought gays getting married was the big threat to marriage. tclambert Dec 2012 #56
9 out of 10 Dentists recommend you end your practice of dentistry..asshat. n/t Jefferson23 Dec 2012 #58
Hmmm...does this mean my wife has to approve the coeds who enroll in my classes? Sancho Dec 2012 #59
given the dentist's comments about "you make my pants bulge" and others, sounds like he fired niyad Dec 2012 #63
Workers without a contract can be fired for anything that falls outside of illegal discrimination Major Nikon Dec 2012 #64
At will employment = Fired for any reason, for no reason, or even for an immoral reason,... Land Shark Dec 2012 #67
Show me a picture of her!! RussBLib Dec 2012 #68
this is sooo stupid samsingh Dec 2012 #69
I'm too sexy for my job ... sunnystarr Dec 2012 #70
That makes me feel so much better about getting fired. leftyladyfrommo Dec 2012 #73
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iowa Court: Bosses Can Fi...»Reply #47