Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(2,715 posts)

1. How about a source NOT from RT? n/t

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 08:51 PM

Dec 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NDAA 2013 - Indefinite detention without trial is back [View all] naaman fletcher Dec 2012 OP

How about a source NOT from RT? n/t a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #1

Would you accept, say, the NY Times? naaman fletcher Dec 2012 #2

much better! a geek named Bob Dec 2012 #3

I don't get it... why would Carl Levin put this back on the table? lib2DaBone Dec 2012 #4

"he awarded himself"? CitizenPatriot Dec 2012 #5

Bullcrap. If he signs is he buys it. nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #10

Sure are a lot of RT bashers just1voice Dec 2012 #19

us media is utterly worthless green for victory Dec 2012 #22

You need to distinguish doing something and having a right to do it. Vattel Dec 2012 #23

Not sure why you think that you need to tell me that. I was of course rhett o rick Dec 2012 #27

Sorry, I missed your point. I guess we agree. Vattel Dec 2012 #28

Sometimes my points are a little hard to follow. At least for myself. rhett o rick Dec 2012 #29

Did he sign it this year democrattotheend Dec 2012 #20

No, the 2012 NDAA has not been signed. tammywammy Dec 2012 #24

Obama WANTS Indefinite Detention in the bill. blkmusclmachine Dec 2012 #8

Would you expect a president to give away power? nm rhett o rick Dec 2012 #30

well election season is indeed over it seems azurnoir Dec 2012 #9

You don't know about NDAA section 1021, HR347, the Patriot Act extension, etc.? Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #15

no I was simply being circumspect in my reply n/t azurnoir Dec 2012 #16

What we really need need is scotus to rule it cstanleytech Dec 2012 #13

You came for Their Is That All There Is Dec 2012 #17