Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

primavera

(5,191 posts)
8. Quite right - EXISTING gun control laws are nowhere near strict enough
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:34 AM
Dec 2012

Hence the need for stricter gun control laws.

Killing the gun owner and taking their guns addressed with gun control? askeptic Dec 2012 #1
Thankfully, according to this poll you are in the minority. DanTex Dec 2012 #2
You didn't answer the question - which law failed? askeptic Dec 2012 #3
It's hard to say with certainty that any specific law would prevent any specific shooting. DanTex Dec 2012 #4
Huffpost's poll, from what I read, is not a scientific poll -- askeptic Dec 2012 #6
Actually, yes it was. DanTex Dec 2012 #7
Two wolves and a sheep vote on what's for dinner. Remmah2 Dec 2012 #5
Quite right - EXISTING gun control laws are nowhere near strict enough primavera Dec 2012 #8
The kid used a military weapon of mass destruction. onehandle Dec 2012 #9
I definitely wouldn't want to force you to think askeptic Dec 2012 #10
That cuts both ways primavera Dec 2012 #11
Where have I taken a position? Just sayin' I'd like to know which law failed askeptic Dec 2012 #13
Go back and re-read your posts primavera Dec 2012 #14
50 percent isn't exactly a tipping point WooWooWoo Dec 2012 #12
There was a movement to ban bucolic_frolic Dec 2012 #15
One very, very simple law could have prevented this shooting. Xithras Dec 2012 #16
Assuming he didn't know where the keys were sir pball Dec 2012 #18
Only 50%? That is very much discouraging. geek tragedy Dec 2012 #17
Bump? Should be freakin' mountain, but we'll take what we can get. AllyCat Dec 2012 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun Control Laws: After S...»Reply #8