Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(151,246 posts)
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:15 AM Jan 2025

Justice Department says it plans to release only part of special counsel's Trump report for now [View all]

Source: AP

Updated 10:15 AM EST, January 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department said Wednesday that it will release special counsel Jack Smith's findings on Donald Trump's efforts to undo the results of the 2020 presidential election but will keep under wraps for now the rest of the record focused on the president-elect's hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

The revelation was made in a filing to a federal appeals court that was considering a defense request to block the release of the two-volume report while charges remain pending against two Trump co-defendants in the Florida case accusing the Republican former president and current president-elect of illegally holding classified documents. Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed judge presiding over the classified documents case, granted the request Tuesday, issuing a temporary block on the report.

The Justice Department said it would proceed with plans to release the first of two volumes centered on the election interference case but would make the classified documents section of the report available only to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees for their private review as long as the case against Trump's co-defendants is ongoing.

"This limited disclosure will further the public interest in keeping congressional leadership apprised of a significant matter within the Department while safeguarding defendants' interests," the filing said.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-jack-smith-jan-6-c788ac8bd4c5b4c4add2338d692d45e0



NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP

Article updated.

Original article -

Updated 10:03 AM EST, January 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department says it will release special counsel Jack Smith's findings on Donald Trump's efforts to undo the results of the 2020 presidential election but will keep the rest of the report under wraps for now.

The revelation was made in a filing Wednesday to a federal appeals court that was considering a defense request to block the release of the two-volume report while charges remain pending against two Trump co-defendants in a case accusing the Republican former president and president-elect of illegally hoarding classified documents.

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goddamn it, Garland. Release the whole fucking report. dalton99a Jan 2025 #1
There is a court order holding back the second volume. That it is bogus doesn't mean it must not be respected Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #3
Why should claudette Jan 2025 #8
Because it is a court order. People like Giuliani don't respect them, but law abiding citizens do Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #12
Exactly Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #27
That's the problem, Democrats obey the rules and then take it up the nose when the pukes don't. dem4decades Jan 2025 #54
Too late.! By the time "a court" reverses it... Grins Jan 2025 #61
But if the claudette Jan 2025 #29
The order is not fake or counterfeit. It is based on bogus reasoning (in my view) & I think it will be overruled Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #30
Because it is a court order endgenocide Jan 2025 #32
Have you looked at the updated AP article in OP? BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #33
In simpler terms DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #66
Because prison time is unappealing? FBaggins Jan 2025 #36
Respected ? Why kacekwl Jan 2025 #34
Easy for you to ask someone to take the federal penitentiary chip for your impatience Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #35
Biden can release the report anytime SurfLiberal Jan 2025 #38
Certainly it is a matter kacekwl Jan 2025 #45
Can't let the poors know the lies & corruption they live under NotHardly Jan 2025 #57
He'll need to ponder that... Gnomad Jan 2025 #59
Garland is SPINELESS Owens Jan 2025 #2
The second volume release is out of his hands for a few days at least Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #5
"..safeguarding defendants' interest..." DV1 Jan 2025 #4
On one hand we have someone who tried to end democracy. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2025 #48
No evidence is being thrown out. thesquanderer Jan 2025 #65
That's a shame claudette Jan 2025 #6
It is the Injustice Dept. Irish_Dem Jan 2025 #7
I shudder to think what Gym-Rat Jordan will do with it..... lastlib Jan 2025 #9
Gym Jordan is in the House, this will be released to Senate Judiciary Gnomad Jan 2025 #49
aw sh*t, forgot about new Congress..... lastlib Jan 2025 #60
My bad... Gnomad Jan 2025 #62
Garland is a shit. .... covering up Trump's crimes just like Bill Barr. Botany Jan 2025 #10
This is an Ellsberg moment. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #11
Wait a few days. Fair chance the 11th Circuit will overrule Cannon, again. They might even reinstate the case. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #14
That would be great. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #15
No, waiting has been our mistake all along. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #16
Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary because you can't wait a brief time. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #20
I have no idea what you're talking about. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #22
Leaking documents can be a Federal crime. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #23
That's weird, I didn't say anything about leaking documents. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #24
Daniel Ellsberg is topic of this subthread, which is what was in mind. He was charged w 115 years, but not convicted. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #25
cool, I was responding to your suggestion we continue waiting to act. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #26
EXACTLY! Cannon's dismissal of the case might still be overturned, sending the case back into court Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #40
There are two Cannon items in front of the 11th now Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #43
Dont put it past him... Gnomad Jan 2025 #63
Jack Smith could've gotten her fired, too bad, so sad, he's resigning Gnomad Jan 2025 #58
Splitting the baby C_U_L8R Jan 2025 #13
NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERS BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #17
Never to be seen by us. Boomerproud Jan 2025 #47
Do you have security clearance to review "classified documents" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #51
So everything outside of the corrupt Judge Cannon's case is to be released. Mister Ed Jan 2025 #18
Part of the stuff supposedly "blocked" by her will be released to the Chair/Ranking Members of the Judiciary Committee BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #31
At this stage of the game, knowing Garland, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #19
The Just Us department. Looking out for what's best for trump. Autumn Jan 2025 #21
Does this surprise anybody? NT Firestorm49 Jan 2025 #28
Nope. orangecrush Jan 2025 #55
Likely to protect ongoing and future cases. Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #37
Merrick the Meek, must protect the convicted felon and not look "political". republianmushroom Jan 2025 #39
Merrick Garland is the worst AG in American history. lark Jan 2025 #41
Release it all now kimbutgar Jan 2025 #42
Nothing released yet in the Justice Dept Special Counsel portal. C0RI0LANUS Jan 2025 #44
Are they gonna release it or waste time advertising they're gonna release it? Deuxcents Jan 2025 #46
Translation: AverageOldGuy Jan 2025 #50
Adverbs, prepositions and conjuntives only Bobstandard Jan 2025 #52
I'm sure that the Republican ranking members Mblaze Jan 2025 #53
Shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #56
The election interference case is Deminpenn Jan 2025 #64
How typical. n/t malthaussen Jan 2025 #67
Who's a weasel............ LPBBEAR Jan 2025 #68
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Department says i...