Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Duchess hoax: Australian radio station 'sought permission' [View all]DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)12. Oh come on yourself. Did you read anything I typed there? I'm not taking a position as I don't care.
It would be easy for either side to produce phone records backing up any claim of either having made or not having received phone calls from the involved opposite party.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Acknowledging they knew the DJs needed permission certainly doesn't help their case.
Hassin Bin Sober
Dec 2012
#4
Phone records from the station and hospital, showing the times and lengths of each call, would help.
DRoseDARs
Dec 2012
#6
Oh come on yourself. Did you read anything I typed there? I'm not taking a position as I don't care.
DRoseDARs
Dec 2012
#12
Heck, I think a dog gets that, too. Who's kidding who here? Another corporate CYA.
freshwest
Dec 2012
#9
Comedy is a thing which can not be self declared. That is, no laughs, it ain't comedy.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2012
#17
a call to Scott Walker in his office is different than a call to a nurse in a hospital
Beaverhausen
Dec 2012
#31
I rank "prank" calls to hospitals in the same category as "prank" calls to 911
magical thyme
Dec 2012
#41
That's one way to rationalize the maintenance of mean-spirited behavior...
LanternWaste
Dec 2012
#26
Well hooey then they should not have broadcast it. That is not an excuse, it is a confession.
yellowcanine
Dec 2012
#33