Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
13. It is only in the rarest of circumstances that I have ever used one
Thu Dec 6, 2012, 02:36 PM
Dec 2012

And it's very rare indeed, but if I have a client in a case where the evidence isn't strong and I know the prosecutor would probably rather not pursue it but for an angry victim or public opinion, I have in a handful of cases had the client take a private polygraph (not stipulated and not revealed to the state ahead of time); if he passed I gave the results to the prosecutor- not as evidence in the case but as something for the prosecutor to "hang his hat on" when explaining to a victim why is was punting a case. In those rare cases it has had value in that regard. Notice none of that has anything to do with using a polygraph as evidence of truthfulness.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. polygraphers questio...»Reply #13