Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

NJCher

(37,181 posts)

22. Yes

Reply to wnylib (Reply #16)

Tue Jul 2, 2024, 11:52 AM

Jul 2

Maybe a plus side is the attention it will give to Trump's criminality. Maybe MAGAs will fear that the ruling gives Biden too much power now.

++You're a writer, am I correct? Well, you know as well as I do that when you start writing, you never really know what's going to come about.

It's important to not feel defeated and to give into negative bias (which is all too common here).

Like writing, get started: one never knows where it will take you. That's what I like about what this legislator did.

Oh, and ask for the world! You can always pare back but it's a self-defeating mistake to ask for just a little, like you don't deserve it.

We DO NOT deserve decisions made by liars and self-admitted biased SC judges. If we let this stand without a fight then it's on us.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New York Dem will introduce amendment to reverse Supreme Court immunity ruling [View all] BumRushDaShow Jul 2 OP

Add to the amendment an ethics code, 18 year term limits and other sensible reforms Pepsidog Jul 2 #1

Not IF, but when. aeromanKC Jul 2 #2

Visibility is beneficial even if it's going nowhere now. /nt bucolic_frolic Jul 2 #3

I am not as worried about this type of immunity Farmer-Rick Jul 2 #4

This is little more than theatre at this time, it is going nowhere and everyone knows it. Bev54 Jul 2 #5

Ah, the inevitable naysayer NJCher Jul 2 #6

There currently are not enough votes in Congress to meet wnylib Jul 2 #9

It might NJCher Jul 2 #12

I hope that's true because, to pass it, we will need wnylib Jul 2 #16

Yes NJCher Jul 2 #22

No, I am not a writer. Not professionally anyway. wnylib Jul 2 #24

-- NJCher Jul 2 #25

"I am not saying that we shouldn't try it" BumRushDaShow Jul 2 #14

I am hardly a naysayer, quite the opposite but I am realistic. Bev54 Jul 2 #30

"Solutions need to be realistic" BumRushDaShow Jul 2 #7

Oh and have you noticed NJCher Jul 2 #8

You sure are quick to label someone, instead of calling someone down, maybe just make your argument. Bev54 Jul 2 #31

I don't need your help in what to post NJCher Jul 2 #35

Such a lovely person Bev54 Jul 2 #37

You can call it theater, but it is important to do everything we can to bring this to the attention of the public. Many Martin68 Jul 2 #29

Even if we could get the votes Miguelito Loveless Jul 2 #10

Where did he say that? NJCher Jul 2 #11

Have you been reading the rulings of late? Miguelito Loveless Jul 2 #17

of course NJCher Jul 2 #23

That does not mean you have read the ruling Bev54 Jul 2 #32

here ya' go NJCher Jul 2 #33

Roberts actually walked back some of the Clarence Thomas-written "Bruen" decision BumRushDaShow Jul 2 #28

Dead on arrival The Grand Illuminist Jul 2 #13

re: "the judgement is virtually final" -- "No it's not." thesquanderer Jul 2 #15

My complaint WAS about how it was phrased BumRushDaShow Jul 2 #18

To me, "virtually final" was a way to help explain the siginficance of this amendment being offered... thesquanderer Jul 2 #21

To follow-up BumRushDaShow Jul 2 #27

I hope I live to see the day when this SCOTUS ruling is declared null and void FakeNoose Jul 2 #19

Worth a shot. BlueWavePsych Jul 2 #20

Just wondering.... MorbidButterflyTat Jul 2 #26

Do it and good luck to you. republianmushroom Jul 2 #34

Question, Would the lynching of the VP been cover as an official act, republianmushroom Jul 2 #36