Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
12. The UN has been working very hard to protect the rights of children and women
Sun Nov 25, 2012, 12:41 PM
Nov 2012

They have been doing wonderful work to expose intra-national adoption as nothing more than human trafficking that merely preys on poor women for a supply of babies for those clamoring to buy one.

Here is Romania's attempt to stop the sale of human infants and children:

What "pro-lifers" fail to realize lbrtbell Nov 2012 #1
Does this really differ Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #2
They allow for more anonymity without compromising the child's safety. Squinch Nov 2012 #10
The child's safety has been damaged the moment of relinquishment me b zola Nov 2012 #11
My family consists of many adopted, adored, well adjusted people. I completely disagree with you. Squinch Nov 2012 #13
We are able to achieve all kinds of things in spite of having our identities stolen me b zola Nov 2012 #18
Adopting and loving and raising a child is not human trafficking. Squinch Nov 2012 #21
You are not purchasing a puppy from the pound me b zola Nov 2012 #25
Again, you are grossly generalizing, in a way that is offensive to loving families. Squinch Nov 2012 #27
It's glaringly apparent you know zero about the adoption process. nt Javaman Nov 2012 #40
Oh, PUHLEEEEZE! bitchkitty Nov 2012 #14
Exactly Squinch Nov 2012 #17
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #20
And I guess you need to generalize your experience to places where it doesn't apply in any way. Squinch Nov 2012 #22
You see, that is part of the big lie that feeds the exploitation of women and children me b zola Nov 2012 #24
Except that's not what I said me b zola Nov 2012 #23
Pro-human traffickers? bitchkitty Nov 2012 #37
You need to chill out and stop projecting . . . MrModerate Nov 2012 #39
We have young friends, a happily married couple, who could not JDPriestly Nov 2012 #34
I am sorry I did not see this conversation before yoy had a post hidden. Ms. Toad Nov 2012 #38
The UN is against the baby boxes. ChazII Nov 2012 #3
The UN has been working very hard to protect the rights of children and women me b zola Nov 2012 #12
My niece would have died get the red out Nov 2012 #29
Well said, get the red out. n/t ChazII Nov 2012 #36
The UN should femrap Nov 2012 #31
I am on your side. ChazII Nov 2012 #35
Keep The Baby Boxes! Vogon_Glory Nov 2012 #4
I agree indie_voter Nov 2012 #6
100% agree get the red out Nov 2012 #7
I don't understand the objection to the baby boxes. Like another DU member said above, I see these tropicanarose Nov 2012 #5
No social safety net in the world get the red out Nov 2012 #8
I think it may be similar to objections to food banks daleo Nov 2012 #26
and so much of this can go away once the Catholic church changes NuttyFluffers Nov 2012 #9
Yes, churches have been a large part of the problem me b zola Nov 2012 #16
Nebraska should have never caved to pressure on their abandonment law, which was up to age 19. justice1 Nov 2012 #15
Really? LisaL Nov 2012 #33
I don't understand. elleng Nov 2012 #19
Because an unwanted baby is much better off dying in a dumpster thelordofhell Nov 2012 #28
Again, Lord, we agree completely. Squinch Nov 2012 #30
"European men mull banning 'boxes' for abandoned babies" fixed your headline. nt DRoseDARs Nov 2012 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Europe mulls banning 'box...»Reply #12