Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)

28. Feel free to get up-close and personal.

Reply to earthside (Reply #16)

Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:44 PM

Nov 2012

Wars have been fought at varying degrees of ranges for millenia. The only people who make the complaints you do.... are those who know nothing about the subject and will not stir themselves to learn or to step into the action.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US military seeks to develop 'silent bullets' [View all] Judi Lynn Nov 2012 OP

Easier to dodge. truthisfreedom Nov 2012 #1

Not necessarily. It's only at certain distances which you can sakabatou Nov 2012 #5

Dodge this jberryhill Nov 2012 #13

You aren't dodging a bullet moving fast enough to wound, full stop. (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2012 #23

Less effective against body armor. tclambert Nov 2012 #2

most of our enemies don't wear body armor anyway WooWooWoo Nov 2012 #8

They would mostly make head shots. oldbanjo Nov 2012 #10

5.56mm, 7.62mm and.338 caliber are all smaller than 9mm - diameter wise anyway. geckosfeet Nov 2012 #3

556,762 and 338 are assault rifle rounds. 9mm sub machine gun and pistol rounds pasto76 Nov 2012 #9

These calibers have a velocity oldbanjo Nov 2012 #11

It"s too bad we couldn't spend this money on another silent killer Earth_First Nov 2012 #4

+1 Poll_Blind Nov 2012 #22

.300 Whisper and .300 AAC Blackout krispos42 Nov 2012 #6

It would seem simpler to just re-issue the old .45ACP 1911s JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2012 #7

Something like a wadcutter with a depleted uranium spike in the center should work FarCenter Nov 2012 #14

Not sure I'd want to carry seven pieces of uranium JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2012 #15

Uranium is an alpha particle emitter, so inside a lead jacket it would be safe. FarCenter Nov 2012 #17

Subsonic ammo has been readily available for many years for these calibers NickB79 Nov 2012 #12

That was my thought, as well DollarBillHines Nov 2012 #26

Making war more antiseptic. earthside Nov 2012 #16

Feel free to get up-close and personal. PavePusher Nov 2012 #28

Wrong. The people making complaints like that are people who despise war, and the misery apocalypsehow Nov 2012 #30

Im confused Liberaltalker Nov 2012 #18

Silencers only work on the sound of the POWDER that propels the bullet, not the bullet happyslug Nov 2012 #20

Awesome post! sofa king Nov 2012 #21

Silencers break down quickly too, don't they? (nt) Posteritatis Nov 2012 #24

Depends on the type. Xithras Nov 2012 #25

The problem is range and penetration happyslug Nov 2012 #19

"for...police forces and the Department of Homeland Security." woo me with science Nov 2012 #27

I'm not an apologist and hate Third Way authoritarians, but I'll try to answer that question. ieoeja Nov 2012 #29

Locking, sorry, this is a feature story about something that might happen in the future. Rhiannon12866 Nov 2012 #31