Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marshall

(6,665 posts)
71. Resident of a state/commonwealth vs. Resident of a country
Tue Nov 20, 2012, 03:37 PM
Nov 2012

I think they are two different things. One can be an "undocumented immigrant" and still be a resident of a state.

Go Massachusetts...another accomplishment by our recently re-elected President for All People. libdem4life Nov 2012 #1
If they are here illegally then how can they prove they have lived in the state? lalalu Nov 2012 #2
It doesn't matter. If they're here then they ought to be eligble for in-state tuition. rachel1 Nov 2012 #3
Not so fast. The difference in costs between in-state and out-of-state are enormous. riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #6
This is not about winning votes Cal Carpenter Nov 2012 #53
Its the rare, very rare, politician that's altruistic. 99% of them are chasing votes riderinthestorm Nov 2012 #78
His intentions are irrelevent Cal Carpenter Nov 2012 #80
Likely they will have to have graduated from roody Nov 2012 #81
That is not how it works. lalalu Nov 2012 #9
This is NOT true. You do NOT have to "present federal and state tax returns." MADem Nov 2012 #18
You are wrong. lalalu Nov 2012 #21
Nice try. No cigar. That's the "form" that the Governor Patrick CHANGED. MADem Nov 2012 #30
You really get the "Duh" reward yourself. lalalu Nov 2012 #35
Look -- you are just dead wrong on this. Give it up. MADem Nov 2012 #67
WTF?! didact Nov 2012 #62
DUH....how about a MA high school diploma? MADem Nov 2012 #19
It is becoming more obvious lalalu Nov 2012 #24
I've provided a link proving you wrong--from the MA government itself. MADem Nov 2012 #25
LOL, keep posting it. lalalu Nov 2012 #29
What do "parents" have to do with an 18 year old (adult) student? MADem Nov 2012 #34
Wow, so you also do not file income taxes. lalalu Nov 2012 #36
The cut off is 24 for FINANCIAL AID. Stop confusing TUITION with FINANCIAL AID. MADem Nov 2012 #43
This is my final response to you. lalalu Nov 2012 #48
Well, joy in the morning--that has NOTHING TO DO WITH TUITION, and it has MADem Nov 2012 #56
Your conflating tuition rates and financial aid tammywammy Nov 2012 #59
What part of the following do you not understand? lalalu Nov 2012 #60
There you go again! Colleges and universities "allow dependency" for the purposes of FINANCIAL AID MADem Nov 2012 #65
High School diploma and school records will show it treestar Nov 2012 #32
No that is not the law. lalalu Nov 2012 #39
This is not true in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. MADem Nov 2012 #44
If they require parents to prove they lived in MA treestar Nov 2012 #46
This isn't about a break for them. lalalu Nov 2012 #49
No it is only about being a resident treestar Nov 2012 #73
It is about proving residency in order to get in state tuition. lalalu Nov 2012 #77
The parents don't even have to get involved. The student can produce two documents, MADem Nov 2012 #66
Lots of undocumented workers roody Nov 2012 #82
How nice of Massachussetts. Piazza Riforma Nov 2012 #4
I agree with letting them attend - but with out-of-state tuition panAmerican Nov 2012 #5
Not against letting them attend college, Piazza Riforma Nov 2012 #7
It's a nice idea, but there wouldn't be reciprocation in many instances panAmerican Nov 2012 #8
My point isn't about whether another state will grant MA students in state rates. Piazza Riforma Nov 2012 #11
Would you then agree that anyone smoking pot --either medical MJ or recreationally in the states MADem Nov 2012 #15
You must not have attended college or have a child in college. lalalu Nov 2012 #23
You are wrong on EVERY count. Try clicking on the link I provided to you, so you do not MADem Nov 2012 #26
Your own link proves you wrong. lalalu Nov 2012 #27
The unemancipated person is the EXCEPTION, not the rule. MADem Nov 2012 #37
LMAO, most students are dependents and lalalu Nov 2012 #38
Emancipation is only possible for those under 18. treestar Nov 2012 #47
That is not true. lalalu Nov 2012 #61
Stop confusing FINANCIAL AID with TUITION. They are not the same thing. nt MADem Nov 2012 #68
The term emancipation does not apply to people who are already adults treestar Nov 2012 #74
Most students are over 18, and therefore, emancipated adults in the eyes of the law. MADem Nov 2012 #50
lalalulu is actually claiming people remain minors treestar Nov 2012 #75
No, just that some of you have minor intelligence. lalalu Nov 2012 #76
The poster is being deliberately obstreperous, I believe. MADem Nov 2012 #79
If they were giving in-state rates to out-of-state illegal immigrants, but not to NYC Liberal Nov 2012 #64
Oat of them are Americans. roody Nov 2012 #83
People who live in the state, who shop in the stores and pay sales tax, who MADem Nov 2012 #84
Agree lalalu Nov 2012 #10
How about a high school diploma from a Massachusetts public school? nt MADem Nov 2012 #13
That is not enough. lalalu Nov 2012 #14
You're not accurate, there. You're way off the mark, in fact. MADem Nov 2012 #16
See post 16. A utility bill and a MA high school diploma will get you in the door. nt MADem Nov 2012 #17
No it will not. lalalu Nov 2012 #22
You plainly don't know what it means--how many college students are under 18, hmmmmm? MADem Nov 2012 #28
So now you claim all illegal immigrant students are lalalu Nov 2012 #31
Bullshit. All "emancipated" means is that a minor is able to enter into a contract. MADem Nov 2012 #40
Emancipated does not mean that and I have shown you lalalu Nov 2012 #42
You have shown me that facts mean nothing to you, and that you are unwilling to learn even when MADem Nov 2012 #51
They are "residents" of Massachusetts. MADem Nov 2012 #12
States give residents lower tuition because their income and sales taxes help support the school Orangepeel Nov 2012 #20
They were brought to the US as children treestar Nov 2012 #33
They've resided in the state most of their lives. MADem Nov 2012 #41
Exactly treestar Nov 2012 #45
I have no problem with what the governor is doing in support of these kids. MADem Nov 2012 #54
The point is that STATE TAXPAYERS get lower in-state rates. Xithras Nov 2012 #86
Back in the early 90s when I was about to attend college WilmywoodNCparalegal Nov 2012 #52
Now see, I disagree with you-- you should have been given the in state rate, assuming MADem Nov 2012 #55
As a minor, I had no options either WilmywoodNCparalegal Nov 2012 #57
You had legal standing--and your parents had the option to apply for citizenship MADem Nov 2012 #63
You are wrong on a few counts WilmywoodNCparalegal Nov 2012 #85
I'm a bit disgusted at your comments, frankly. You ARE "blaming the kids" if you don't realize that MADem Nov 2012 #87
You can sure tell that Massachusetts is a Democratic state by this. The wave of ALEC-inspired state pampango Nov 2012 #58
These children did nothing wrong. They are part of our community. MADem Nov 2012 #69
Good points. Conservatives don't want any move towards legalization because it removes pampango Nov 2012 #72
Education brings prosperity and opportunity to the population as a whole Politicub Nov 2012 #70
Resident of a state/commonwealth vs. Resident of a country marshall Nov 2012 #71
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Immigrants to Pay Tuition...»Reply #71