Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 06:14 PM Nov 2012

Top Republican Suggests Obama Sat On Petraeus Scandal Until After The Election [View all]

Source: ThinkProgress


By Igor Volsky posted from ThinkProgress Justice on Nov 18, 2012 at 5:00 pm

During a Sunday appearance on Meet The Press, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) baselessly claimed that President Obama knew about Gen. David Petraeus’ affair before the election, implying that the administration somehow manipulated the timeline of the scandal. “I’m not sure the president was not told before the Election Day,” he asserted. “The Attorney General said that the Department of Justice did not notify the President. But we don’t know if the Attorney General did.”

Attorney General Eric Holder defended his department’s handling of the investigation earlier this week, noting that standard protocol prohibits DOJ from sharing information about pending investigations with members of Congress or the president, so long as they do not undermine national security. Later in the program, former Clinton Chief of Staff and Chair of the Center for American Progress, John Podesta, explained that the rule has been in place since 1993 and is designed to prevent politics from contaminating the process. He encouraged Obama to improve that buffer:

PODESTA: With respect to what Andrea [Mitchell] said about Mike Rogers tossing this hand grenade on the table, I would note he did it with zero evidence. In 1993, back to the Clinton era, Andrea will remember this, I recommended strict protocols between the Justice Department and the White House, which were implemented. I’m sure they have changed to some extent. But there is a reason why the Justice Department doesn’t talk to the White House about ongoing active investigations. I think that President Obama ought to direct the Attorney General to obviously review those and report to him about whether they could be improved. But there are very good reasons why the Justice Department doesn’t talk to the White House about investigations.

Watch it:



Justice Department officials had known about the investigation since the summer, but were told that the matter did not affect national security. Petraeus’s boss, Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr, was notified about the affair on Election Day, after the FBI concluded its review. That night, Clapper advised Petraeus to resign.

-30-

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/11/18/1211381/top-republicans-suggests-obama-sat-on-petraeus-scandal-until-after-the-election/
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Excuse me, but wasn't it Eric Cantor that sat on this? notadmblnd Nov 2012 #1
Actually Rogers knew all about it before the election. DURHAM D Nov 2012 #4
The President is under no legal or constitutional obligation to "report" this type of behavior xtraxritical Nov 2012 #15
No, Eric Cantor sat on it until after the election. Right? W T F Nov 2012 #2
Cantor claims he reported it to the FBI Director on October 27. nt DonViejo Nov 2012 #7
Personally... AlbertCat Nov 2012 #3
These guys Harry_Scrote Nov 2012 #5
No matter what, GOPpers will blame Pres O and his administration Iliyah Nov 2012 #6
Screw you, Mike. pangaia Nov 2012 #8
Still trying to blame the lost election on any & everything else but Romney, and.... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2012 #9
Obama should not say or do anything until oldbanjo Nov 2012 #10
Cantor was told by Dave Reichert Andy823 Nov 2012 #11
So what if it is true? RandySF Nov 2012 #12
And exactly how would this Petraeus sex scandal helped glowing Nov 2012 #13
"Golly! I sure hope Petraeus being a dickhead can be used to create some sort of problem for Obama!" struggle4progress Nov 2012 #14
Hey, fuckstick. blackspade Nov 2012 #16
My reply to Chairman Rogers: ReRe Nov 2012 #17
So. bush had his buddy bin laden release a video the Friday before elections. Hoyt Nov 2012 #18
Sounds like whackadoodle conspiracy theories. nt RandiFan1290 Nov 2012 #19
I'm John2 Nov 2012 #20
There's no Republican in Congress fit to be a leader. oldbanjo Nov 2012 #25
The GOP can't get anything on the Prez so as usual they make shit up. Such losers. Sore losers. judesedit Nov 2012 #21
GOP got nothin but greed and lies. NOTHIN good about em. judesedit Nov 2012 #22
Bush massacred Falluja to distract from Ohio 2004. Where was the GOP outrage? McCamy Taylor Nov 2012 #23
Spam deleted by gkhouston (MIR Team) Dubster Nov 2012 #24
I wouldn't care if it were true. Get over losing the election. n/t Lil Missy Nov 2012 #26
It wouldn't have been classy for Obama to use another repug sex-scandal bhikkhu Nov 2012 #27
The more house republicans go on about Benghazi, the fewer will be reelected in 2014. kiranon Nov 2012 #28
A republican made scandal by Republican Generals and Historic NY Nov 2012 #29
This reminds me of the pukes going after Clinton. luv_mykatz Nov 2012 #30
Who cares anyways? Petraeus was a Republican and Obama spent tons of time trying to reach out to Jennicut Nov 2012 #31
Didn't Eric Cantor HAVE TO sit on the story because it was an ongoing investigation? You can't blow Coyotl Nov 2012 #32
I'm sorry but the words 'House Intelligence Committee' and Republican are oxymorons to me benld74 Nov 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top Republican Suggests O...