Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access [View all]
Source: NBCNews.com
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would restrict gun ownership, a response to what the governor described as an "existential crisis" of mass shootings in America.
The California Democrat wants to raise the minimum age to buy a firearm to 21, mandate universal background checks, impose a waiting period on buyers and ban the civilian purchase of assault weapons.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/gavin-newsom-calls-constitutional-amendment-curb-gun-access-rcna57951
This is gutsy. I support this.
For those who say "It'll never happen. It's a waste of time. It's too hard and improbable..." I point you to Roe vs. Wade. People thought that was forever, but conservatives worked patiently for 50 years and got it overturned.
If it takes 50 years to get a 28th amendment, or the 2nd repealed, we should do it. The earlier we start, the earlier it'll happen.
This country is such a far outlier in gun violence statistics - even when compared to countries with civil war and civil unrest - that we have to do something. Anything.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
57 replies, 3697 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (67)
ReplyReply to this post
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gov. Gavin Newsom calls for constitutional amendment to curb gun access [View all]
SpankMe
Jun 2023
OP
That's Correct Y'all Time Takes Time - If You Never Begin It Never Happens
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#2
The Governor of California doesn't have a role in Constitutional Amendments...
brooklynite
Jun 2023
#28
That's Right, Persuasive Speech Is A Core Component Of Any Second Order Societal Change
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#33
You're saying nobody has previously called for a CA to address gun control?
brooklynite
Jun 2023
#37
I'm just saying there hasn't been any traction for the obvious constitutional discussion
ColinC
Jun 2023
#48
Agree. Gov Newsom's got gutz. Can't believe he was once married to that cray cray woman now w Don Jr
onetexan
Jun 2023
#9
I think the gun lobby in this country is getting fewer and fewer members OR supporters...
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#10
Well, yes, if you assume that the Supremes who favor gun control haven't already learned what you
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#20
I understand your argument and it makes sense. However, not all of our gun problems in society are
CTyankee
Jun 2023
#42
The MAGA gun humpers on Twitter are all just replying "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!"
forgotmylogin
Jun 2023
#40
Endorse / Add Your Name: Support a 28th Amendment to the Constitution on Guns:
TeamProg
Jun 2023
#17
It'll never happen. It's a waste of time. To those who say "I point you to Roe vs. Wade"...
FBaggins
Jun 2023
#39
Can't Never Could - Second Order Change Is An Incremental Journey That Begins With The First Step
MayReasonRule
Jun 2023
#41
and a Constitutional Convention declaration is equally difficult. Realistically, very unlikely to
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#46
Do they have the votes in Congress or through the states now? Unlikely. Unless the 2024
JohnSJ
Jun 2023
#45
There is nothing a governor can do. I appreciate the sentiment but one could just as easily
Demsrule86
Jun 2023
#52
You still have to have a vote at the end...and a convention requires a certain number of states.
Demsrule86
Jun 2023
#54