Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zeitghost

(3,796 posts)
46. Are you suggesting
Fri May 26, 2023, 12:16 AM
May 2023

That Kagen, Sotomayor and Brown-Jackson are on the take? How are they compromised and what proof do you have?

And the Nutters think its Democrats that want to Ruin America... RegulatedCapitalistD May 2023 #1
Ignore the pigs-in-a-blanket peppertree May 2023 #2
Brick by brick... ret5hd May 2023 #3
Creating a dystopian environmental future, repealing one EPA regulation at a time. nt OAITW r.2.0 May 2023 #4
All nine voted against the EPA. hedda_foil May 2023 #5
All nine concurred that the specific land/wetlands at issue in this case did not meet the KPN May 2023 #23
Thank you for clarifying. hedda_foil May 2023 #26
Democrats have waited long enough to add judges to the supreme court Escurumbele May 2023 #6
The Dem Justices also voted against the EPA obamanut2012 May 2023 #7
Conservatives are really good at picking the right cases The Mouth May 2023 #19
"What are they waiting for?" BumRushDaShow May 2023 #8
Better yes, how does it pass in the House? Polybius May 2023 #21
That is a given at the moment BumRushDaShow May 2023 #25
it was a unanimous descision moonshinegnomie May 2023 #10
Not exactly. The decision set aside the agency's determination that the wetland involved was KPN May 2023 #30
it was a unanimous descision moonshinegnomie May 2023 #9
How much $$$ did it cost mountain grammy May 2023 #11
different sacketts moonshinegnomie May 2023 #18
Doesn't matter. Same disease. mountain grammy May 2023 #24
All 3 liberal Justices Zeitghost May 2023 #39
Very bad decision mountain grammy May 2023 #43
There is no benefit for them in compromise Zeitghost May 2023 #45
I've learned to never argue with a 9-0 decision Polybius May 2023 #47
All 9 voted for it. Are you saying all 9 were paid? jimfields33 May 2023 #28
The court is compromised. mountain grammy May 2023 #44
Are you suggesting Zeitghost May 2023 #46
I'm suggesting that this court is compromised mountain grammy May 2023 #51
And The Clean Water Act was bipartisan and championed by Nixon... JT45242 May 2023 #12
SCOTUSblog had a link to the opinion (PDF) BumRushDaShow May 2023 #14
This court will ALWAYS side with billionaires and corporations. CousinIT May 2023 #13
And these people know noting about wetland behaviors and ecosystems Novara May 2023 #15
Well what this exposed was that the law needs to be updated BumRushDaShow May 2023 #16
instead of speculating about what a wetland is, here's the EPA's definition Novara May 2023 #27
I don't know if you read the ruling BumRushDaShow May 2023 #32
lots of hyperbole there. Novara May 2023 #33
Exactly BumRushDaShow May 2023 #34
a total cop-out Novara May 2023 #35
From what I understand, this case was brought in 2007 BumRushDaShow May 2023 #36
she's absolutely right Novara May 2023 #37
Probably because it was narrow, pretty much focused on this one property owner BumRushDaShow May 2023 #38
This is an excellent summary why this is such a horrible decision Novara May 2023 #48
Well it's actually worse than just that BumRushDaShow May 2023 #49
Agreed. And fuck knows where that will lead us. Novara May 2023 #53
VOTE ... and expand the court! KPN May 2023 #17
So 13-0 instead of 9-0? jimfields33 May 2023 #29
Maybe as regards to EPAs determination as to whether the law and its implementing regulations KPN May 2023 #31
Kavanaugh in the minority Polybius May 2023 #20
It was actually "unanimous" BumRushDaShow May 2023 #22
I'm not a lawyer but I'm pretty good at reading laws and cases jgmiller May 2023 #40
I agree, jg, and may do just that, when I find the time. elleng May 2023 #42
'the remaining four -- concurred in the judgment. elleng May 2023 #41
No surprise orangecrush May 2023 #50
when the (formerly) supreme court makes a ruling Marthe48 May 2023 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules again...»Reply #46