Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Should have been closer to 20 than 2. Violation of his oath as an officer. Wonder Why Mar 2023 #1
Technically only if he was a current member of the military or a member of the reserves. cstanleytech Mar 2023 #16
Retirees are subject to UCMJ, Article 2. sarge43 Mar 2023 #36
I said technically not legally. cstanleytech Mar 2023 #43
Hell yes. Duppers Mar 2023 #24
To be dismissed he would have to be convicted by a General Court Martial. sarge43 Mar 2023 #33
Oh, thanks. Duppers Mar 2023 #37
It should, but there is that, double jeop; however, sarge43 Mar 2023 #38
He might *wish* he was in the USDB COL Mustard Mar 2023 #56
It does delight the imagination. n/t sarge43 Mar 2023 #58
Double Jeopardy wouldn't apply... Shipwack Mar 2023 #39
... Faux pas Mar 2023 #2
The 21 year old on another thread got 40 months - and he was just a dumbass. Probatim Mar 2023 #31
Yeah, this a bullshit sentence. intheflow Mar 2023 #46
THIS!!☝️ onetexan Mar 2023 #54
Black guys get 10x that for having a joint on them. NullTuples Mar 2023 #59
Wow! We're not at war, so it's not treason, but it's definitely... TreasonousBastard Mar 2023 #3
Prosecution wanted 5 years, I believe. 2 is not long enough for this guy. Bev54 Mar 2023 #4
Unless he's started working with the Feds COL Mustard Mar 2023 #57
'Especially reprehensible' that the sentence is so light... RockRaven Mar 2023 #5
Yes. Owl Mar 2023 #30
An officer receiving a pension is still subject to the UCMJ CanonRay Mar 2023 #6
Sedition more likely sarge43 Mar 2023 #35
Maximum he faced was 20 years and a $250,000 fine Auggie Mar 2023 #7
This is a major let down. He should be in prison for a long, long time. chowder66 Mar 2023 #8
Yes 3auld6phart Mar 2023 #55
How long has he been retired? Backseat Driver Mar 2023 #9
"Reprehensible" two years? Novara Mar 2023 #10
Now do Flynn QED Mar 2023 #11
YES! Duppers Mar 2023 #26
Look at what a retired Lt. Col. was willing to do for trump. Paladin Mar 2023 #12
Brock was one of the insurrectionists with zip ties, IIRC Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #13
I was wondering if that was him Kaleva Mar 2023 #20
Isn't this the guy whose ex wife turned him in? Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2023 #48
I think there was more than one of those... Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #49
Lol. Yes. I had to google it. Brock's wife turned him in before the cleanup was even done. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2023 #51
Sad to think RussBLib Mar 2023 #14
Unfortunately there are actually people in the military as law enforcement like that but cstanleytech Mar 2023 #18
should be stripped of his pension and his va benefits. fuck him. nt Javaman Mar 2023 #15
He got off with an extraordinarily light sentence given the manifesto he had written. cstanleytech Mar 2023 #17
prison is awful pirsquared Mar 2023 #34
And let us remember the manifesto this guy wrote. intheflow Mar 2023 #47
like it republianmushroom Mar 2023 #19
Commander Whiz Nuts! Larry Brock. Botany Mar 2023 #21
Take away his pension and VA benefits. paleotn Mar 2023 #22
Take away his oak leaves, too. Aristus Mar 2023 #23
YES! +1000 Duppers Mar 2023 #27
yes! I got 18 months for filing too many and too frequent gopiscrap Mar 2023 #50
WTF.. only 2 years for that SHIT?! Cha Mar 2023 #25
Col. ZipTies deserves 25 times that. Kid Berwyn Mar 2023 #41
What? He was one of the zip-tie dudes IbogaProject Mar 2023 #28
What a fucking joke dalton99a Mar 2023 #29
Shoulda got what trump wanted purr-rat beauty Mar 2023 #32
While there have been some really... Wuddles440 Mar 2023 #40
He should be tried for violation of UCMJ Article 88. James48 Mar 2023 #42
Traitor. twodogsbarking Mar 2023 #44
He should be recalled to active duty, court martialed The Wizard Mar 2023 #45
Did the judge even consider those points? LiberalFighter Mar 2023 #52
So why did he get off so easy if prosecutors were asking for 5 years and that was the low end Martin68 Mar 2023 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Especially reprehensible...»Reply #27