Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(139,129 posts)
Wed Nov 16, 2022, 05:10 PM Nov 2022

Senate clears key procedural step on bill to protect same-sex marriage [View all]

Last edited Wed Nov 16, 2022, 07:00 PM - Edit history (3)

Source: CNN Politics

CNN — The Senate on Wednesday cleared a key procedural hurdle toward historic passage of the bipartisan bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriage, voting 62-37 to break a filibuster.

There could be additional votes before final passage, but Wednesday’s successful test vote signals the bill is on a glide path to succeed, a remarkable turn of events given how contentious the issue of same-sex marriage was just a few years ago.

While the bill would not set a national requirement that all states must legalize same-sex marriage, it would require individual states to recognize another state’s legal marriage. So, in the event the Supreme Court might overturn its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage, a state could still pass a law to ban same-sex marriage, but that state would be required to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state.

All 50 members of the Democratic caucus voted to start debate on the bill as well as 12 Republicans.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/16/politics/senate-vote-same-sex-marriage



Article updated.

Previous article -

CNN -- The Senate on Wednesday cleared a key procedural hurdle toward passage of the bipartisan bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriage, voting 62-37 to break a filibuster to advance.

There could be additional votes before final passage, but Wednesday's successful test vote signals it is on a glide path to succeed.

While the bill would not set a national requirement that all states must legalize same-sex marriage, it would require individual states to recognize another state's legal marriage. So, in the event the Supreme Court might overturn its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage, a state could still pass a law to ban same-sex marriage, but that state would be required to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state.

All 50 members of the Democratic caucus voted to start debate on the bill as well as 12 Republicans.


Original article and headline -

Senate clears key procedural step on legislation codifying same-sex marriage

CNN -- The Senate on Wednesday cleared a key procedural hurdle toward passage of the bipartisan bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriage.

There could be additional votes before final passage, but Wednesday's successful test vote signals it is on a glide path to succeed.

While the bill would not set a national requirement that all states must legalize same-sex marriage, it would require individual states to recognize another state's legal marriage. So, in the event the Supreme Court might overturn its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision that legalized same-sex marriage, a state could still pass a law to ban same-sex marriage, but that state would be required to recognize a same-sex marriage from another state.

Without an agreement to speed up passage of the bill that needs consent from all 100 senators, final passage will likely occur after the Senate returns from Thanksgiving recess.
53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I know I'm all over these threads, but this is personal for me BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #1
But since there is no existing *federal* law, isn't this a step forward? Fiendish Thingy Nov 2022 #2
Not at all BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #4
You are so wrong. William769 Nov 2022 #6
So then prove me wrong how does this protect gay marriage? BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #7
Federal law trumps state laws, State Constitution. Thats how our government is set up. William769 Nov 2022 #8
This doesn't protect our right to get married in those states. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #9
I am not following here. Can you explain this better? boston bean Nov 2022 #15
Sure! BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #16
Ok. I think I understand but you may be wrong n boston bean Nov 2022 #17
No I get it. It's not bad, it just doesn't go far enough imo. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #18
It did away with DOMA completely. boston bean Nov 2022 #19
True! And that's good! BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #20
Welcome to the wombers club. boston bean Nov 2022 #21
The new legislation won't help in that sense tho. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #22
Agreed. But the scotus decides what is constitutional no one else. And if they boston bean Nov 2022 #23
I'm not denying that this is roughly the best that could be done BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #24
No scotus allows it. Not this bill. boston bean Nov 2022 #25
Well this bill doesn't say states cant deny you a marriage license. It supports that Right explicitl BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #26
Not quite right. boston bean Nov 2022 #27
First, if obergefell isnt overturned then this law becomes moot BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #28
I don't see it that way at all BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #33
It's not a step back and it doesn't take away anything. yardwork Nov 2022 #39
If obergefell goes down, we will have zero protections of access to gay marriage BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #40
You think New York, Connecticut, California, Massachusetts ETC will ban Gay marriage? Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #44
absolutely not, and I explicitly stated that was not a likely possibility. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #46
You know, I live in Ohio where they just passed a law that allows medical professionals to Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #47
Ok so let me ask you - what does this law do? Specifically BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #48
Ohio also has a same sex marriage ban, btw. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #49
I'm gay and married, and I see this as a protection and good step. yardwork Nov 2022 #30
If you're already married though, then this doesn't affect you at all BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #36
Yes, I know. It's not ideal but it's a protection. yardwork Nov 2022 #37
I don't disagree with you - just pointing out flaws and personal disappointments BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #38
Yes it does affect those already married. Their marriages would be deemed illegal. Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #41
And this doesn't stop that from happening BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #42
I think you are wrong about that...and certainly it could not stop Gay marriage without this bill Demsrule86 Nov 2022 #43
I hope for the LGBT communitie's sake, I'm wrong too. BrienDoesIt Nov 2022 #45
Yeah LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2022 #3
Kick & highly recommended. William769 Nov 2022 #5
I'll second that! sheshe2 Nov 2022 #29
Good to see you! William769 Nov 2022 #32
Both my Republican senators voted in favor. yardwork Nov 2022 #31
You're lucky. William769 Nov 2022 #34
Mine usually are, too. yardwork Nov 2022 #35
So states are still free to make gay and interracial marriages illegal for their own residents. 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2022 #10
Only if SCOTUS overturns current precedent FBaggins Nov 2022 #11
Yeah... and if they do, this law still allows discrimination. 50 Shades Of Blue Nov 2022 #13
Not as much as if it doesn't pass FBaggins Nov 2022 #14
Is the aim to also get this through the House and onto Bidens desk OnDoutside Nov 2022 #12
Did the house Rebl2 Nov 2022 #50
The House already passed their own version back in July BumRushDaShow Nov 2022 #51
Thanks for info Rebl2 Nov 2022 #52
You're welcome! BumRushDaShow Nov 2022 #53
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate clears key procedu...