Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Johnny2X2X

(19,059 posts)
41. This is my district
Thu Sep 22, 2022, 11:41 AM
Sep 2022

He's not from here and is a total nutcase. Hillary Scholten is going to thrash him in the election.

But people shouldn't write off what he was saying, there is a very significant part of the GOP that would love to revoke women's rights to vote.

May he, and his enablers, receive everything they deserve. niyad Sep 2022 #1
Thrice over. So mote it be. n/t TygrBright Sep 2022 #2
I've got a small mirror for trying to ensure slightlv Sep 2022 #16
SMIB! Deep State Witch Sep 2022 #40
Cuz goin back to '55 jest ain't good enuf Turbineguy Sep 2022 #3
1955 or 1855? LakeArenal Sep 2022 #5
How do these people get into a place like Stanford? Turbineguy Sep 2022 #6
Money is one of those standards. LiberalFighter Sep 2022 #34
Dude . . . . . no_hypocrisy Sep 2022 #4
They would probably be happier if it was 55 BC. cstanleytech Sep 2022 #27
Thank you so much for posting these. niyad Sep 2022 #38
Under His eye, eh asshole? Leghorn21 Sep 2022 #7
Now if I were the Democratic candidate opposing this...uh, individual mpcamb Sep 2022 #8
Obviously a member of Our Gang's He-Man Women Haters Club no_hypocrisy Sep 2022 #9
NO MA'AM - Al Bundy keithbvadu2 Sep 2022 #33
Excellent mahina Sep 2022 #46
Meet Hillary Scholten..MI 3rd...Ain't just about a Gibbs disgusting misogynist Ah!@# asiliveandbreathe Sep 2022 #10
Calling all Neanderthals or CroMagnon! CRK7376 Sep 2022 #11
Are you kidding me? vlyons Sep 2022 #12
That's rich coming from someone that looks lke him. How about the repeal of the 13th Amendment, catbyte Sep 2022 #13
He's stupid, with stupid. Republicons think the opposite of "diversity is strength". Examples Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2022 #22
Aw, somebody made him pick up his dirty clothes Walleye Sep 2022 #14
No wife - as I thought. He has an ad up with him and his mother. Maraya1969 Sep 2022 #15
i guess any woman that votes for him should have their vote rejected moonshinegnomie Sep 2022 #17
Vote rejected and a bunch of sessions with a good "shrink." paleotn Sep 2022 #19
Yep ck4829 Oct 2022 #50
Someone is scared to death of women, me thinks. paleotn Sep 2022 #18
His arguments seem pretty emotionally based GenThePerservering Sep 2022 #20
CONservatives tend to be very stupid. Some examples: Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2022 #21
Looks like at least one is trolling GenThePerservering Sep 2022 #23
He obviously has no idea how many people would be overjoyed to deny him the vote and LoisB Sep 2022 #24
the incel school of constitutional law nt prodigitalson Sep 2022 #25
"Incel Inside" NT GenThePerservering Sep 2022 #28
Indeed ck4829 Oct 2022 #49
They would love to go back to at least 1918 before the 19th Amendment was pushed through Congress. Ford_Prefect Sep 2022 #26
Proof they want to take the country RocRizzo55 Sep 2022 #29
Something's bad wrong with human male primates who think like this. Timeflyer Sep 2022 #30
Yes indeed. scarletlib Sep 2022 #31
Some women would give up the right to vote in order to elect Trump keithbvadu2 Sep 2022 #32
This is frightening... RevBrotherThomas Sep 2022 #35
Token DownriverDem Sep 2022 #37
Gibbs DownriverDem Sep 2022 #36
said the loser Marthe48 Sep 2022 #39
This is my district Johnny2X2X Sep 2022 #41
I looked and looked RussBLib Sep 2022 #42
District is very winnable scipan Sep 2022 #43
I believe several conservative women have had the same opinion, including Phyllis Schaffly and Ann Martin68 Sep 2022 #44
What a Gohmert. mahina Sep 2022 #45
There are maps showing that most states would be red if women couldn't vote. IronLionZion Sep 2022 #47
K&R for exposure ck4829 Oct 2022 #48
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP congressional candida...»Reply #41